Cited by 259Pain Management and TreatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain: From phenomenology to mechanisms

Garcia-Larrea, Luis, Peyron, Roland·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is relatively recent neurosurgical technique for pain control, the use of which is growing steadily since its description in the last decade. While clinical series show that at least 50% of patients with chronic, pharmacoresistant neuropathic pain may benefit from this technique, the mechanisms of action of MCS remain elusive. In this review, we synthesise a number of studies that, combining electrophysiology and functional imaging, have permitted to proceed from phenomenology to models that may account for part of such mechanisms. MCS appears to trigger rapid and phasic activation in the lateral thalamus, which leads to a cascade of events of longer time-course in medial thalamus, anterior cingulate/orbitofrontal cortices and periaqueductal grey matter. Activity in these latter structures is delayed relative to actual cortical neurostimulation and becomes maximal during the hours that follow MCS arrest. Current hypotheses suggest that MCS may act through at least two mechanisms: activation of perigenual cingulate and orbitofrontal areas may modulate the emotional appraisal of pain, rather than its intensity, while top down activation of brainstem PAG may lead to descending inhibition toward the spinal cord. Recent evidence also points to a possible secretion of endogenous opioids triggered by chronic MCS. This, along with the delayed and long-lasting activation of several brain structures, is consistent with the clinical effects of MCS, which m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.062

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garcia-Larrea, L., & Peyron, R.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
37
Pages
S71-S79
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029045410
Cited by
259
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
motor cortex stimulation, neuropathic pain, chronic pain, mechanism of action, lateral thalamus, medial thalamus, periaqueductal gray, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, descending pain inhibition, endogenous opioids, pain management
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Chronic Disease, Endorphins, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Cortex, Pain, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Neurosurgical Procedures, Positron-Emission Tomography, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review