Cited by 492Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter

Nowak, L. G., Bullier, J.·1998·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Extracellular electrical stimulation of the gray matter is often used to determine the function of a given cortical area or pathway. However, when it is used to elicit postsynaptic effects, the presynaptic neuronal elements activated by electrical stimulation have never been clearly identified: it could be the excitable dendrites, the cell body, the axon initial segment, or the axonal branches. To identify these elements, we performed two series of experiments on slices of rat visual cortex maintained in vitro. The first series of experiments, reported in this paper, was aimed at determining the chronaxie, a temporal parameter related to the membrane properties of the neuronal elements. In order to identify the presynaptic elements that were activated by extracellular electrical stimulation, chronaxies corresponding to postsynaptic responses were measured and compared with those corresponding to the activation of axons (antidromic activation) and those corresponding to the activation of cell bodies (intracellular current injection in intracellularly recorded neurons). The chronaxie for orthodromic activation was similar to that for axonal activation, but was 40 times smaller than the chronaxie for direct cell body activation. This suggests that, whenever a postsynaptic response is elicited after electrical stimulation of the cortical gray matter, axons (either axonal branches or axon initial segments), but not cell bodies, are the neuronal elements activated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002210050304

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nowak, L. G., & Bullier, J.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
1998-02-02
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
477-488
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2183760535
Cited by
492
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
extracellular electrical stimulation, cortical gray matter, axons, axon initial segment, chronaxie, antidromic activation, postsynaptic response, membrane properties
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Electric Stimulation, Electrophysiology, Extracellular Space, Female, Male, Neural Conduction, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review