The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses
Abstract
This paper describes a dynamic causal model (DCM) for induced or spectral responses as measured with the electroencephalogram (EEG) or the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). We model the time-varying power, over a range of frequencies, as the response of a distributed system of coupled electromagnetic sources to a spectral perturbation. The model parameters encode the frequency response to exogenous input and coupling among sources and different frequencies. The Bayesian inversion of this model, given data enables inferences about the parameters of a particular model and allows us to compare different models, or hypotheses. One key aspect of the model is that it differentiates between linear and non-linear coupling; which correspond to within and between-frequency coupling respectively. To establish the face validity of our approach, we generate synthetic data and test the identifiability of various parameters to ensure they can be estimated accurately, under different levels of noise. We then apply our model to EEG data from a face-perception experiment, to ask whether there is evidence for non-linear coupling between early visual cortex and fusiform areas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Having said this, DCM is used routinely to invert models with thousands of free parameters (e.g. DCM for induced electromagnetic sources; Chen et al. 2008).”
From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2008
Citations
Cites
Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8 · Cited by 7,328
Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence
Kuramoto, Y. (1984) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3 · Cited by 7,242
Synchronization a universal concept in nonlinear sciences
PIKOVSKY, A. S., Rosenblum, M. G., & Kurths, J. (2001) · Cited by 5,640
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Phase Synchronization of Chaotic Oscillators
Rosenblum, M. G., PIKOVSKY, A. S., & Kurths, J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1804 · Cited by 2,755
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation
Tallon‐Baudry, C. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1 · Cited by 2,205
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- David, 2003, A theoretical and experimental introduction to the non-invasive study of large-scale neural phase synchronization in human beings, Int. J. Comput. Cogn., 1, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–136 of 136
Dynamic causal modelling in probabilistic programming languages
Baldy, N., Woodman, M., Jirsa, V., & Hashemi, M. (2025) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2024.0880 · Cited by 6
Goudman, L., Marinazzo, D., de Steen, F. V., Nagels, G., Smedt, A. D., Huysmans, E., Putman, K. D., Buyl, R., Ickmans, K., Nijs, J., et al. (2020) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146728 · Cited by 6
Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00087-5_18 · Cited by 6
Bifurcation and synchronization analysis of neural mass model subpopulations
Александрович, Г. А., Plotnikov, S. A., & Fradkov, А. L. (2017) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2577 · Cited by 6
Bayesian Quantitative Electrophysiology and Its Multiple Applications in Bioengineering
Barr, R. C., Nolte, L. W., & Pollard, A. E. (2010) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2010.2089375 · Cited by 5
Emergence of multifrequency activity in a laminar neural mass model
Aristides, R. P., Clusella, P., Sanchez-Todo, R., Ruffini, G., & García‐Ojalvo, J. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014022 · Cited by 4
Visual Mental Imagery and Neural Dynamics of Sensory Substitution in the Blindfolded Subjects
Kim, H., Kim, J. S., & Chung, C. K. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120621 · Cited by 3
3.9 Analyzing Functional and Effective Connectivity with fMRI
Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372731.003.0016 · Cited by 3
Eyes Open on Sleep and Wake: In Vivo to In Silico Neural Networks
Vanvinckenroye, A., Vandewalle, G., Phillips, C. L. M., & Chellappa, S. L. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/1478684 · Cited by 2
Interhemispheric integration in the neural face perception network: Does stimulus location matter?
Stocker, J. E., Schulz, A., Thome, I., Sommer, J. B., Rabeneck, J., Rusch, K. M., Steinsträter, O., & Jansen, A. (2025) · Imaging Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/imag.a.17 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Causal Models for Human Electrophysiology: EEG, MEG, and LFPs
Moran, R. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00340-7 · Cited by 1
Accelerating Computation of DCM for ERP with GPU-Based Parallel Strategy
Wang, W.-J., Hsieh, I.-F., & Chen, C. (2012) · Autonomic and Trusted Computing · doi:10.1109/uic-atc.2012.74 · Cited by 1
4.2 Clinical Applications: Epilepsy
Laufs, H., & Thornton, R. (2010) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372731.003.0018 · Cited by 1
Galván, A., & Peris, T. S. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatry and Brain Science · doi:10.20900/jpbs.20200025 · Cited by 1
State space models and their spectral decomposition in dynamic causal modeling
Moran, R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139941433.006 · Cited by 1
Studying Dynamic Neural Interactions with MEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62657-4_18-1 · Cited by 1
Variational Bayesian parameter estimation techniques for the general linear modelPreprint
Starke, L., & Ostwald, D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/077461 · Cited by 1
Wilkins, K. B., Dewald, J., & Yao, J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/547083 · Cited by 1
Seignette, M., & Christensen, M. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.12.17.423230 · Cited by 1
A deep hierarchy of predictions enables assignment of semantic roles in online speech comprehensionPreprint
Su, Y., MacGregor, L. J., Olasagasti, I., & Giraud, A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.04.01.486694 · Cited by 1
Dynamic Causal Modeling in Probabilistic Programming LanguagesPreprint
Baldy, N., Woodman, M., Jirsa, V., & Hashemi, M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.06.622230 · Cited by 1
Causal modelling of evoked brain responses.
Garrido, M. I. (2008) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1
Díez, Á. (2013) · Gredos (University of Salamanca) · doi:10.14201/gredos.122923
Prediction error dependent changes in brain connectivity during associative learning
den Ouden, H. E. M. (2009) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
System Models for Inference on Mechanisms of Neuronal Dynamics
Stephan, K. E., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Wiley-VCH eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600906.mcb.201100042
3.8 Analyzing Effective Connectivity with EEG and MEG
Kiebel, S. J., Garrido, M. I., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372731.003.0015
Causal Modeling: Methods and Their Application to Speech and Language
Baojuan Li, A., Ahlfors, S. P., Pinotsis, D. A., Friston, K. J., & Mody, M. (2017) · Innovations in cognitive neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7325-5_8
Parametric dynamic causal modellingPreprint
Jafarian, A., Zeidman, P., Wykes, R. C., Walker, M. C., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.11650
Extended Dynamical Causal Modelling for Phase Coupling (eDCM PC)
Yeldesbay, A., & Daun, S. (2025) · Journal of Open Research Software · doi:10.5334/jors.412
Gómez-Lombardi, A., Costa, B. G., Prado, P., Muñoz, P., & El‐Deredy, W. (2026) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.1857
Limitations of Variational Laplace-Based Dynamic Causal Modelling for Multistable Cortical Circuits
Asadpour, A., Azimi, A., & Wong‐Lin, K. (2026) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-025-09759-w
Entropic measures of connectivity with an application to intracerebral epileptic signals
Zhu, J. (2016) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/4999f639zef40z44f4z8617z8d4d3e129bb5
Zheng, W., & Geng, D. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115683
Hung, C. (2008) · Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, C.C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1293-1312
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013176407
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, induced responses, spectral response, EEG, MEG, Bayesian parameter estimation, model comparison, nonlinear coupling, parameter identifiability, face perception, fusiform gyrus, early visual cortex, distributed source model
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electroencephalography, Humans, Synapses, Magnetoencephalography, Models, Statistical, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
