The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses
Abstract
This paper describes a dynamic causal model (DCM) for induced or spectral responses as measured with the electroencephalogram (EEG) or the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). We model the time-varying power, over a range of frequencies, as the response of a distributed system of coupled electromagnetic sources to a spectral perturbation. The model parameters encode the frequency response to exogenous input and coupling among sources and different frequencies. The Bayesian inversion of this model, given data enables inferences about the parameters of a particular model and allows us to compare different models, or hypotheses. One key aspect of the model is that it differentiates between linear and non-linear coupling; which correspond to within and between-frequency coupling respectively. To establish the face validity of our approach, we generate synthetic data and test the identifiability of various parameters to ensure they can be estimated accurately, under different levels of noise. We then apply our model to EEG data from a face-perception experiment, to ask whether there is evidence for non-linear coupling between early visual cortex and fusiform areas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“Having said this, DCM is used routinely to invert models with thousands of free parameters (e.g. DCM for induced electromagnetic sources; Chen et al. 2008).”
From Network discovery with DCM (2011) · cites this paper as Chen et al. 2008
Citations
Cites
Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8 · Cited by 7,328
Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence
Kuramoto, Y. (1984) · Springer series in synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69689-3 · Cited by 7,242
Synchronization a universal concept in nonlinear sciences
PIKOVSKY, A. S., Rosenblum, M. G., & Kurths, J. (2001) · Cited by 5,640
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Phase Synchronization of Chaotic Oscillators
Rosenblum, M. G., PIKOVSKY, A. S., & Kurths, J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1804 · Cited by 2,755
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation
Tallon‐Baudry, C. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01299-1 · Cited by 2,205
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- David, 2003, A theoretical and experimental introduction to the non-invasive study of large-scale neural phase synchronization in human beings, Int. J. Comput. Cogn., 1, 53
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG
Schoffelen, J., & Groß, J. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20745 · Cited by 889
Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling
Stephan, K. E., Penny, W. D., Moran, R. J., den Ouden, H. E. M., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.015 · Cited by 803
Self-citationEEG and MEG Data Analysis in SPM8
Vladimir Litvak, A., Mattout, J., Kiebel, S. J., Phillips, C. L. M., Henson, R. N., Kilner, J. M., Barnes, G. R., Oostenveld, R., Jean Daunizeau, A., Flandin, G., et al. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/852961 · Cited by 586
Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression
Stephan, K. E., Manjaly, Z. M., Mathys, C. D., Weber, L. A. E., Paliwal, S., Gard, T., Tittgemeyer, M., Fleming, S. M., Haker, H., Seth, A. K., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00550 · Cited by 437
“…further work is required to extend this to a network-level DCM. DCM has also been formulated for M/EEG data, serving to explain a variety of data features such as event-related potentials (David et al., 2006), induced responses (Chen et al., 2008), or steady-state responses (Moran et al., 2009).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, C. C., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, C.C.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1293-1312
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013176407
- Cited by
- 136
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088130)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, induced responses, spectral response, EEG, MEG, Bayesian parameter estimation, model comparison, nonlinear coupling, parameter identifiability, face perception, fusiform gyrus, early visual cortex, distributed source model
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Brain, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electroencephalography, Humans, Synapses, Magnetoencephalography, Models, Statistical, Nonlinear Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
