The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining sparsity and rotational invariance in EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Abstract
We introduce Focal Vector Field Reconstruction (FVR), a novel technique for the inverse imaging of vector fields. The method was designed to simultaneously achieve two goals: a) invariance with respect to the orientation of the coordinate system, and b) a preference for sparsity of the solutions and their spatial derivatives. This was achieved by defining the regulating penalty function, which renders the solutions unique, as a global l(1)-norm of local l(2)-norms. We show that the method can be successfully used for solving the EEG inverse problem. In the joint localization of 2-3 simulated dipoles, FVR always reliably recovers the true sources. The competing methods have limitations in distinguishing close sources because their estimates are either too smooth (LORETA, Minimum l(1)-norm) or too scattered (Minimum l(2)-norm). In both noiseless and noisy simulations, FVR has the smallest localization error according to the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD), which is introduced here as a meaningful measure to compare arbitrary source distributions. We also apply the method to the simultaneous localization of left and right somatosensory N20 generators from real EEG recordings. Compared to its peers FVR was the only method that delivered correct location of the source in the somatosensory area of each hemisphere in accordance with neurophysiological prior knowledge.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sparsity is often assumed to avoid over-fitting in inverse problems, and has increasing applications in signal and image processing (43, 50–54).”
From Electrophysiological source imaging: A noninvasive window to brain dynamics (2018) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 17,214
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation
Schmidt, R. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1986.1143830 · Cited by 14,718
Model Selection and Estimation in Regression with Grouped Variables
Yuan, M., & Lin, Y. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00532.x · Cited by 7,261
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (1998) · SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · doi:10.1137/s1064827596304010 · Cited by 6,734
A Matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones
Sturm, J. (1999) · Optimization methods & software · doi:10.1080/10556789908805766 · Cited by 5,955
The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval
Rubner, Y., Tomasi, C., & Guibas, L. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026543900054 · Cited by 5,547
Beamforming: a versatile approach to spatial filtering
Van Veen, B. D., & Buckley, K. M. (1988) · IEEE ASSP Magazine · doi:10.1109/53.665 · Cited by 3,901
Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details.
Pascual-Marqui, R. D. (2002) · PubMed · Cited by 3,329
Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1994) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-x · Cited by 2,869
Sparsity and Smoothness Via the Fused Lasso
Tibshirani, R. J., Saunders, M. A., Rosset, S., Zhu, J., & Knight, K. (2004) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00490.x · Cited by 2,643
A sparse signal reconstruction perspective for source localization with sensor arrays
Malioutov, D., Cetin, M., & Willsky, A. S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.850882 · Cited by 2,638
Applications of second-order cone programming
Lobo, M. S., Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S., & Lebret, H. (1998) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0024-3795(98)10032-0 · Cited by 2,405
Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG
Nunez, P. L., & Harth, E. M. (1982) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2915137 · Cited by 2,257
Dale, A. M., & Sereno, M. I. (1993) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.2.162 · Cited by 2,003
Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02512476 · Cited by 1,995
Baillet, S., Mosher, J., & Leahy, R. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,846
Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG
Fermaglich, J. (1982) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1982.03320380071046 · Cited by 1,557
Enhancement of MR Images Using Registration for Signal Averaging
Holmes, C. J., Hoge, R. D., Collins, D. L., Woods, R. P., Toga, A. W., & Evans, A. C. (1998) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199803000-00032 · Cited by 1,422
Sparse solutions to linear inverse problems with multiple measurement vectors
Cotter, S. F., Rao, B. D., Engan, K., & Kreutz-Delgado, K. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.849172 · Cited by 1,385
Robust linear programming discrimination of two linearly inseparable sets
Bennett, K. P., & Mangasarian, O. L. (1992) · Optimization methods & software · doi:10.1080/10556789208805504 · Cited by 787
Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex
Scherg, M., & CRAMON, D. V. (1986) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(86)90014-6 · Cited by 703
Neuromagnetic source imaging with FOCUSS: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm
Gorodnitsky, I. F., George, J. S., & Rao, B. D. (1995) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(95)00107-a · Cited by 567
Visualization of Magnetoencephalographic Data Using Minimum Current Estimates
Uutela, K., Hämäläinen, M., & Somersalo, E. (1999) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0454 · Cited by 512
Source localization using recursively applied and projected (RAP) MUSIC
Mosher, J. C., & Leahy, R. M. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.740118 · Cited by 398
A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem
Baillet, S., & Garnero, L. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.568913 · Cited by 326
Mauguı̀ere, F., Merlet, I., Forss, N., Vanni, S., Jousmäki, V., Adeleine, P., & Hari, R. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00006-0 · Cited by 255
Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem
Matsuura, K., & Okabe, Y. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.387200 · Cited by 243
27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
(2005) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.841641 · Cited by 169
An Evaluation of Methods for Neuromagnetic Image Reconstruction
Jeffs, B. D., Leahy, R. M., & Singh, M. (1987) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1987.325996 · Cited by 149
Vector-based spatial-temporal minimum L1-norm solution for MEG
Huang, M.-X., Dale, A., Song, T., Halgren, E., Harrington, D., Podgorny, I., Cañive, J., Lewis, S. F., & Lee, R. R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.029 · Cited by 123
Analytic expansion of the EEG lead field for realistic volume conductors
Nolte, G., & Dassios, G. (2005) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/010 · Cited by 85
Self-citationClassification on proximity data with LP-machines
Graepel, T. (1999) · International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks · doi:10.1049/cp:19991126 · Cited by 84
Huttunen, J., Komssi, S., & Lauronen, L. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.196 · Cited by 65
Komssi, S., Huttunen, J., Aronen, H. J., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2003) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.034 · Cited by 49
Nakata, K., Yamashita, M., Fujisawa, K., & Kojima, M. (2005) · Parallel Computing · doi:10.1016/j.parco.2005.07.002 · Cited by 29
Kincses, W. E., Braun, C., Kaiser, S., Grodd, W., Ackermann, H., & Mathiak, K. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10079 · Cited by 24
Depth normalization in MEG/EEG current density imaging
Köhler, T., Wagner, M., Fuchs, M., Wischmann, H.-A., Drenckhahn, R., & Theißen, A. (2002) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.1996.651989 · Cited by 21
MEG/EEG Source Localization Using Spatio-temporal Sparse Representations
Polonsky, A., & Zibulevsky, M. (2004) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-30110-3_126 · Cited by 7
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging
Haufe, S., Meinecke, F. C., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Haynes, J., Blankertz, B., & Bießmann, F. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.067 · Cited by 1,423
Self-citationAutomatic Classification of Artifactual ICA-Components for Artifact Removal in EEG Signals
Winkler, I., Haufe, S., & Tangermann, M. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-7-30 · Cited by 782
Self-citationIntroduction to machine learning for brain imaging
Lemm, S., Blankertz, B., Dickhaus, T., & Müller, K. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.004 · Cited by 658
Self-citationA critical assessment of connectivity measures for EEG data: A simulation study
Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Müller, K., & Nolte, G. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.036 · Cited by 332
Self-citationRobust artifactual independent component classification for BCI practitioners
Winkler, I., Brandl, S., Horn, F., Waldburger, E., Allefeld, C., & Tangermann, M. (2014) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/11/3/035013 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Haufe, S., Nikulin, V. V., Ziehe, A., Müller, K.-R., & Nolte, G.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin (DE)
- Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Haufe, Stefan
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 726-738
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007364043
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
- Keywords
- EEG source reconstruction, MEG source reconstruction, rotation invariance, sparse regularization, source localization, Wasserstein distance, dipole source localization, LORETA
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Computer Simulation, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Electroencephalography, Humans, Models, Neurological, Magnetoencephalography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
