The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reading the mind's eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery
Open accessAbstract
Category information for visually presented objects can be read out from multi-voxel patterns of fMRI activity in ventral temporal cortex. What is the nature and reliability of these patterns in the absence of any bottom-up visual input, for example, during visual imagery? Here, we first ask how well category information can be decoded for imagined objects, and then compare the representations evoked during imagery and actual viewing. In an fMRI study, four object categories were either visually presented to subjects, or imagined by them. Using pattern classification techniques we could reliably decode category information (including for non-special categories, i.e., food and tools) from ventral temporal cortex in both conditions, but only during actual viewing from retinotopic areas. Interestingly, in temporal cortex when the classifier was trained on the viewed condition and tested on the imagined condition, or vice-versa, classification performance was comparable to within the imagined condition. The above results held even when we did not use information in the specialized category-selective areas. Thus, the patterns of representation during imagery and actual viewing are in fact surprisingly similar to each other. Consistent with this observation, the maps of “diagnostic voxels” (i.e., the classifier weights) for the perception and imagery classifiers were more similar in ventral temporal cortex than in retinotopic cortex. These results suggest that in the absence of any bottom-up input cortical back projections can selectively re-activate specific patterns of neural activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 1×
“Perceptual processing involves interactions between top–down signals and bottom–up inputs (Koch and Poggio, 1999; Lamme et al., 1998; Murray et al., 2002; Rao and Ballard, 1999; Williams et al., 2008).”
BackgroundBeyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data
Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.005 · Cited by 2,271
Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain
Kamitani, Y., & Tong, F. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1444 · Cited by 1,829
Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas
Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07832 · Cited by 1,347
Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study
Ganis, G., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012 · Cited by 765
Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images
Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00168-9 · Cited by 579
When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery?
Kosslyn, S. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.723 · Cited by 515
Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex
Murray, S. O., Kersten, D., Olshausen, B. A., Schrater, P., & Woods, D. L. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192579399 · Cited by 496 · cited 1×
“Perceptual processing involves interactions between top–down signals and bottom–up inputs (Koch and Poggio, 1999; Lamme et al., 1998; Murray et al., 2002; Rao and Ballard, 1999; Williams et al., 2008).”
BackgroundVisual mental imagery induces retinotopically organized activation of early visual areas
Slotnick, S. D., Thompson, W. L., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi035 · Cited by 458
Top-down activation of shape-specific population codes in visual cortex during mental imagery
Stokes, M., Thompson, R., Cusack, R., & Duncan, J. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4657-08.2009 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Mental Imagery: Functional Mechanisms and Clinical Applications
Pearson, J., Naselaris, T., Holmes, E. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.003 · Cited by 1,087
Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies
Nishimoto, S., Vu, A. T., Naselaris, T., Benjamini, Y., Yu, B., & Gallant, J. L. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.031 · Cited by 933
The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery
Pearson, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 · Cited by 820
Decoding Patterns of Human Brain Activity
Tong, F., & Pratte, M. S. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100412 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, L., Tsuchiya, N., & Serre, T.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 818-825
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127094700
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reading the mind's eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.084
- The paper
- Reddy, L., Tsuchiya, N., & Serre, T. (2010). Reading the mind's eye: Decoding category information during mental imagery. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.