Cited by 22Epilepsy research and treatmentEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain function

Noninvasive cortical imaging of epileptiform activities from interictal spikes in pediatric patients

Open access
Lai, Yuan, Zhang, Xin, van Drongelen, Wim, Korhman, Michael, Hecox, Kurt, Ni, Ying, He, Bin·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Improved non-invasive localization of the epileptogenic foci prior to epilepsy surgery would improve surgical outcome in patients with partial seizure disorders. A critical component for the identification of the epileptogenic brain is the analysis of electrophysiological data obtained during ictal activity from prolonged intracranial recordings. The development of a noninvasive means to identify the seizure onset zone (SOZ) would thus play an important role in treating patients with intractable epilepsy. In the present study, we have investigated non-invasive imaging of epileptiform activity in patients with medically intractable epilepsy by means of a cortical potential imaging (CPI) technique. Eight pediatric patients (1M/7F, ages 4-14 years) with intractable partial epilepsy were studied. Each patient had multiple (6 to 14) interictal spikes (IIS) subjected to the CPI analysis. Realistic geometry boundary element head models were built using each individual's MRI in order to maximize the imaging precision. CPI analysis was performed on the IISs, and extrema in the estimated CPI images were compared with SOZs as determined from the ictal electrocorticogram (ECoG) recordings, as well as the resected areas in the patients and surgical outcomes. The distances between the maximum cortical activities of the IISs reflected by the estimated cortical potential distributions and the SOZs were determined to quantitatively evaluate the performance of the CPI in localizing the epileptogenic zone. Ictal ECoG recordings revealed that six patients exhibited a single epileptogenic focus while two patients had multiple foci. In each patient, the CPI results revealed an area of activity overlapping with the SOZs as identified by ictal ECoG. The distance from the extreme of the CPI images at the peak of IIS to the nearest intracranial electrode associated with the onset of the ictal activity was evaluated for each patient and the averaged distance was 4.6mm. In the group of patients studied, the CPI imaged epileptogenic foci were within the resected areas. According to the follow-up of the eight patients included, two were seizure free and six had substantial reduction in seizure frequency. These promising results demonstrate the potential for noninvasive localization of the epileptogenic focus from interictal scalp EEG recordings. Confirmation of our results may have a significant impact on the process of presurgical planning in pediatric patients with intractable epilepsy by dramatically reducing or potentially eliminating the use of intracranial recording.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.026

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, Y., Zhang, X., van Drongelen, W., Korhman, M., Hecox, K., Ni, Y., & He, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
He, Bin
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
244-252
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991554320
Cited by
22
References
51
Citations by year
2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (RO1 EB007920, RO1 EB006433, RO1 EB00178)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
interictal spikes, epileptogenic zone localization, seizure onset zone, pediatric epilepsy, drug-resistant epilepsy, presurgical planning, electrocorticography, boundary element method, scalp EEG, epilepsy surgery, focal epilepsy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Epilepsies, Partial, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Models, Neurological, Parietal Lobe, Scalp, Skull, Temporal Lobe, Anterior Temporal Lobectomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review