Cited by 131Anomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Patient classification as an outlier detection problem: An application of the One-Class Support Vector Machine

Open access
Mourão-Miranda, Janaina, Hardoon, David R., Hahn, Tim, Marquand, Andre F., Williams, Steve C.R., Shawe-Taylor, John, Brammer, Michael·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Pattern recognition approaches, such as the Support Vector Machine (SVM), have been successfully used to classify groups of individuals based on their patterns of brain activity or structure. However these approaches focus on finding group differences and are not applicable to situations where one is interested in accessing deviations from a specific class or population. In the present work we propose an application of the one-class SVM (OC-SVM) to investigate if patterns of fMRI response to sad facial expressions in depressed patients would be classified as outliers in relation to patterns of healthy control subjects. We defined features based on whole brain voxels and anatomical regions. In both cases we found a significant correlation between the OC-SVM predictions and the patients' Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), i.e. the more depressed the patients were the more of an outlier they were. In addition the OC-SVM split the patient groups into two subgroups whose membership was associated with future response to treatment. When applied to region-based features the OC-SVM classified 52% of patients as outliers. However among the patients classified as outliers 70% did not respond to treatment and among those classified as non-outliers 89% responded to treatment. In addition 89% of the healthy controls were classified as non-outliers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.042

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mourão-Miranda, J., Hardoon, D. R., Hahn, T., Marquand, A. F., Williams, S. C. R., Shawe-Taylor, J., & Brammer, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
793-804
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080951458
Cited by
131
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust Career Development Fellowship (WT086565/Z/08/Z)
  • EPSRC (WT088641/Z/09/Z)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
one-class support vector machine, outlier detection, depression, functional MRI, sad facial expressions, treatment response prediction, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, brain activation patterns, region-based features, voxel features, patient classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review