Brain responses to handwritten and printed letters differentially depend on the activation state of the primary motor cortex
Abstract
Previous studies demonstrated that visual perception of handwritten letters activates the left primary motor cortex more strongly than printed letters. Here, we used EEG to record cortical responses evoked by single letters to directly test if their visual processing is actually influenced by their motor content. We manipulated the "motor familiarity" of letters that we considered high for letters written by the observers themselves, medium for letters written by other individuals, and low for printed, machine designed letters. In order to relate the effects of motor familiarity to the activation of the primary motor cortex, we also directly manipulated its availability during the visual task: we computed Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) over the posterior cortex during a dual task where participants had to observe the letters while performing unrelated self-paced brief movements of the right hand approximately every 5s (allowing the primary motor cortex to successively activate and "idle"). At 300-350 ms and 500-600 ms after stimulus onset, the amplitude of the ERP components markedly reflected the level of motor familiarity of the observed letter. Nonetheless, this was true only when the primary motor cortex was in an "idling" state: when the motor cortex was in an activation state, this motor familiarity effect was dropped. This clearly indicates that, at these latencies, the motor information embedded in letters is processed in the brain and that this processing depends on the activation state of the left primary motor cortex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Motor information contained in handwritten letters is processed by the brain, and this processing depends on the activation state of the motor cortex corresponding to the limb used in writing.
“These results also indicate that the motor information contained in handwritten letters is processed by the brain and that this processing depends on the activation state of the motor cortex corresponding to the limb used in writing.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Proverbio, A. M., Riva, F., & Zani, A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005389 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
What differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study
Longcamp, M., Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2011) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21105 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wamain, Y., Tallet, J., Zanone, P.-G., & Longcamp, M.
- Affiliations
- Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Wamain, Yannick
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1766-1773
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121454412
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- handwritten letters, printed letters, primary motor cortex, visual perception of letters, motor imagery, dual-task interference, letter recognition, event-related potentials
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review