Cited by 25Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationTactile and Sensory Interactions

Brain responses to handwritten and printed letters differentially depend on the activation state of the primary motor cortex

Wamain, Yannick, Tallet, Jessica, Zanone, Pier-Giorgio, Longcamp, Marieke·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that visual perception of handwritten letters activates the left primary motor cortex more strongly than printed letters. Here, we used EEG to record cortical responses evoked by single letters to directly test if their visual processing is actually influenced by their motor content. We manipulated the "motor familiarity" of letters that we considered high for letters written by the observers themselves, medium for letters written by other individuals, and low for printed, machine designed letters. In order to relate the effects of motor familiarity to the activation of the primary motor cortex, we also directly manipulated its availability during the visual task: we computed Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) over the posterior cortex during a dual task where participants had to observe the letters while performing unrelated self-paced brief movements of the right hand approximately every 5s (allowing the primary motor cortex to successively activate and "idle"). At 300-350 ms and 500-600 ms after stimulus onset, the amplitude of the ERP components markedly reflected the level of motor familiarity of the observed letter. Nonetheless, this was true only when the primary motor cortex was in an "idling" state: when the motor cortex was in an activation state, this motor familiarity effect was dropped. This clearly indicates that, at these latencies, the motor information embedded in letters is processed in the brain and that this processing depends on the activation state of the left primary motor cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Motor information contained in handwritten letters is processed by the brain, and this processing depends on the activation state of the motor cortex corresponding to the limb used in writing.

    “These results also indicate that the motor information contained in handwritten letters is processed by the brain and that this processing depends on the activation state of the motor cortex corresponding to the limb used in writing.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wamain, Y., Tallet, J., Zanone, P.-G., & Longcamp, M.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Wamain, Yannick
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
1766-1773
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121454412
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
handwritten letters, printed letters, primary motor cortex, visual perception of letters, motor imagery, dual-task interference, letter recognition, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review