Cited by 175Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsPrimate Behavior and EcologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 110 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Virtual dissection and comparative connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in chimpanzees and humans

Open access

Abstract

Many of the behavioral capacities that distinguish humans from other primates rely on fronto-parietal circuits. The superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) is the primary white matter tract connecting lateral frontal with lateral parietal regions; it is distinct from the arcuate fasciculus, which interconnects the frontal and temporal lobes. Here we report a direct, quantitative comparison of SLF connectivity using virtual in vivo dissection of the SLF in chimpanzees and humans. SLF I, the superior-most branch of the SLF, showed similar patterns of connectivity between humans and chimpanzees, and was proportionally volumetrically larger in chimpanzees. SLF II, the middle branch, and SLF III, the inferior-most branch, showed species differences in frontal connectivity. In humans, SLF II showed greater connectivity with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, whereas in chimps SLF II showed greater connectivity with the inferior frontal gyrus. SLF III was right-lateralized and proportionally volumetrically larger in humans, and human SLF III showed relatively reduced connectivity with dorsal premotor cortex and greater extension into the anterior inferior frontal gyrus, especially in the right hemisphere. These results have implications for the evolution of fronto-parietal functions including spatial attention to observed actions, social learning, and tool use, and are in line with previous research suggesting a unique role for the right anterior inferior frontal gyrus in the evolution of human fronto-parietal network architecture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.039

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 127 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Jenkinson, 2012, Fsl, Neuroimage, 62, 782, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Johnson-Frey, 2003, What's so special about human tool use?, Neuron, 39, 201, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00424-0 · DOI
  3. Levy, 2011, Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1224, 40, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05958.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Orban, 2012, An area specifically devoted to tool use in human left inferior parietal lobule, Behav. Brain Sci., 35, 234, 10.1017/S0140525X11001944 · DOI
  5. Petrides, 2005, Lateral prefrontal cortex: architectonic and functional organization, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 360, 781, 10.1098/rstb.2005.1631 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Von Bonin, 1948, The frontal lobe of primates; cytoarchitectural studies, Res. Publ. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 22, 67

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, E. E., Gutman, D. A., Bradley, B. A., Preuss, T. M., & Stout, D.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Hecht, Erin E.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
108
Pages
124-137
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994212787
Cited by
175
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (F/00 144/BP)
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation Dissertation Fieldwork Grant and Osmundsen Initiative Award (7699)
  • The John Templeton Foundation (40463)
  • National Institutes of Health (RR-00165)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, chimpanzees, human evolution, white matter connectivity, inferior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal premotor cortex, hemispheric lateralization, arcuate fasciculus, comparative neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Pan troglodytes, Dissection, Biological Evolution, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review