Cited by 171Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

Functional connectivity hubs of the mouse brain

Liska, Adam, Galbusera, Alberto, Schwarz, Adam J., Gozzi, Alessandro·2015·NeuroImage

Abstract

Recent advances in functional connectivity methods have made it possible to identify brain hubs - a set of highly connected regions serving as integrators of distributed neuronal activity. The integrative role of hub nodes makes these areas points of high vulnerability to dysfunction in brain disorders, and abnormal hub connectivity profiles have been described for several neuropsychiatric disorders. The identification of analogous functional connectivity hubs in preclinical species like the mouse may provide critical insight into the elusive biological underpinnings of these connectional alterations. To spatially locate functional connectivity hubs in the mouse brain, here we applied a fully-weighted network analysis to map whole-brain intrinsic functional connectivity (i.e., the functional connectome) at a high-resolution voxel-scale. Analysis of a large resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) dataset revealed the presence of six distinct functional modules related to known large-scale functional partitions of the brain, including a default-mode network (DMN). Consistent with human studies, highly-connected functional hubs were identified in several sub-regions of the DMN, including the anterior and posterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices, in the thalamus, and in small foci within well-known integrative cortical structures such as the insular and temporal association cortices. According to their integrative role, the identified hubs exhibited mutual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.033

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liska, A., Galbusera, A., Schwarz, A. J., & Gozzi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Gozzi, Alessandro
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
115
Pages
281-291
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070632454
Cited by
171
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
  • Simons Foundation (314688)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mouse brain, functional connectome, resting-state fMRI, default mode network, large-scale brain organization, cingulate cortex, thalamus, insula, temporal association cortex
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dogs, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Thalamus, Prefrontal Cortex, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review