Cited by 141Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesPain Management and Placebo EffectAction Observation and Synchronization

Localizing Pain Matrix and Theory of Mind networks with both verbal and non-verbal stimuli

Open access
Jacoby, Nir, Bruneau, Emile, Koster-Hale, Jorie, Saxe, Rebecca·2016·NeuroImage

Abstract

Functional localizer tasks allow researchers to identify brain regions in each individual's brain, using a combination of anatomical and functional constraints. In this study, we compare three social cognitive localizer tasks, designed to efficiently identify regions in the "Pain Matrix," recruited in response to a person's physical pain, and the "Theory of Mind network," recruited in response to a person's mental states (i.e. beliefs and emotions). Participants performed three tasks: first, the verbal false-belief stories task; second, a verbal task including stories describing physical pain versus emotional suffering; and third, passively viewing a non-verbal animated movie, which included segments depicting physical pain and beliefs and emotions. All three localizers were efficient in identifying replicable, stable networks in individual subjects. The consistency across tasks makes all three tasks viable localizers. Nevertheless, there were small reliable differences in the location of the regions and the pattern of activity within regions, hinting at more specific representations. The new localizers go beyond those currently available: first, they simultaneously identify two functional networks with no additional scan time, and second, the non-verbal task extends the populations in whom functional localizers can be applied. These localizers will be made publicly available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.025

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The theory of mind network is a set of brain regions engaged when a person attempts to infer somebody's mental state, with or without language.

    “The most relevant to our current discussion is the theory of mind network [178], a set of brain regions that are engaged when their owner is attempting to infer somebody’s mental state (with our without the use of language; [179, 180]).”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [180]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacoby, N., Bruneau, E., Koster-Hale, J., & Saxe, R.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Jacoby, Nir
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
126
Pages
39-48
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2210361125
Cited by
141
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PMC
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R01 MH096914-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
pain matrix, social cognition, bodily pain, emotional pain, nonverbal stimuli, individual differences
MeSH terms
Cognitive Neuroscience, Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Cerebrum, Young Adult, Theory of Mind, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review