The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT Magnetization Transfer Contrast (MTC) and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) experiments measure the transfer of magnetization from molecular protons to the solvent water protons, an effect that becomes apparent as an MRI signal loss (“saturation”). This allows molecular information to be accessed with the enhanced sensitivity of MRI. In analogy to Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), these saturation data are presented as a function of the chemical shift of participating proton groups, e.g. OH, NH, NH2, which is called a Z‐spectrum. In tissue, these Z‐spectra contain the convolution of multiple saturation transfer effects, including nuclear Overhauser enhancements (NOEs) and chemical exchange contributions from protons in semi‐solid and mobile macromolecules or tissue metabolites. As a consequence, their appearance depends on the magnetic field strength (B0) and pulse sequence parameters such as B1 strength, pulse shape and length, and interpulse delay, which presents a major problem for quantification and reproducibility of MTC and CEST effects. The use of higher B0 can bring several advantages. In addition to higher detection sensitivity (signal‐to‐noise ratio, SNR), both MTC and CEST studies benefit from longer water T1 allowing the saturation transferred to water to be retained longer. While MTC studies are non‐specific at any field strength, CEST specificity is expected to increase at higher field because of a larger chemical shift dispersion of the resonances of interest (similar to MRS). In addition, shifting to a slower exchange regime at higher B0 facilitates improved detection of the guanidinium protons of creatine and the inherently broad resonances of the amine protons in glutamate and the hydroxyl protons in myoinositol, glycogen, and glucosaminoglycans. Finally, due to the higher mobility of the contributing protons in CEST versus MTC, many new pulse sequences can be designed to more specifically edit for CEST signals and to remove MTC contributions. HIGHLIGHTSBasics of nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST).Comprehensive description of the features of the endogenous saturation spectrum (Z‐spectrum) in MRI.Explanation of advantages of using higher magnetic field for CEST MRI.Critical assessment of CEST data analysis approaches.Critical assessment of early CEST applications for the brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relaxation Processes in a System of Two Spins
Solomon, I. (1955) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.99.559 · Cited by 3,278
Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice
Cavanagh, J. (1995) · Cited by 1,636
Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo
Wolff, S. D., & Balaban, R. S. (1989) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910100113 · Cited by 1,482
Ward, K. M., Aletras, A. H., & Balaban, R. S. (2000) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1006/jmre.1999.1956 · Cited by 1,429
T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T
Stanisz, G. J., Odrobina, E. E., Pun, J., Escaravage, M., Graham, S. J., Bronskill, M. J., & Henkelman, R. M. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20605 · Cited by 1,266
Self-citationStudy of Moderately Rapid Chemical Exchange Reactions by Means of Nuclear Magnetic Double Resonance
Forsén, S., & Hoffman, R. A. (1963) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1734121 · Cited by 1,222
Using the amide proton signals of intracellular proteins and peptides to detect pH effects in MRI
Zhou, J., Payen, J.-F., Wilson, D. A., Traystman, R. J., & van Zijl, P. C. M. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm907 · Cited by 1,198
Self-citationBottomley, P. A., Foster, T. H., Argersinger, R. E., & Pfeifer, L. M. (1984) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.595535 · Cited by 1,192
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?
van Zijl, P. C. M., & Yadav, N. N. (2011) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.22761 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationMeasurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images
Henkelman, R. M. (1985) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.595711 · Cited by 1,017
Cited by
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
Ladd, M. E., Bachert, P., Meyerspeer, M., Moser, E., Nagel, A. M., Norris, D. G., Schmitter, S., Speck, O., Straub, S., & Zaiss, M. (2018) · Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.pnmrs.2018.06.001 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- van Zijl, P. C. M., Lam, W. W., Xu, J., Knutsson, L., & Stanisz, G. J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 222-241
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2605468160
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 16.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.045
- The paper
- van Zijl, P. C. M., Lam, W. W., Xu, J., Knutsson, L., & Stanisz, G. J. (2018). Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum. NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.