The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age
Abstract
The longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) hydrogen (1 H) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxation times of normal human and animal tissue in the frequency range 1–100 MHz are compiled and reviewed as a function of tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, in vivo versus in vitro status, time after excision, and age. The dominant observed factors affecting T1 are tissue type and NMR frequency (ν). All tissue frequency dispersions can be fitted to the simple expression T1=A νB in the range 1–100 MHz, with A and B tissue‐dependent constants. This equation provides as good or better fit to the data as previous more complex formulas. T2 is found to be multicomponent, essentially independent of NMR frequency, and dependent mainly on tissue type. Mean and raw values of T1 and T2 for each tissue are tabulated and/or plotted versus frequency and the fitting parameters A, B and the standard deviations determined to establish the normal range of relaxation times applicable to NMR imaging. The mechanisms for tissue NMR relaxation are reviewed with reference to the fast exchange two state (FETS) model of water in biological systems, and an overview of the dynamic state of water and macromolecular hydrogen compatible with the frequency, temperature, and multicomponent data is postulated. This suggests that 1 H tissue T1 is determined predominantly by intermolecular (possibly rotational) interactions between macromolecules and a single bound hydration layer, and the T2 is governed mainly by exchange diffusion of water between the bound layer and a free water phase. Deficiencies in measurement techniques are identified as major sources of data irreproducibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T
Stanisz, G. J., Odrobina, E. E., Pun, J., Escaravage, M., Graham, S. J., Bronskill, M. J., & Henkelman, R. M. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20605 · Cited by 1,266
The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging
Edelstein, W. A., Glover, G. H., Hardy, C. J., & Redington, R. W. (1986) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910030413 · Cited by 758
The development of brain white matter microstructure
Lebel, C., & Deoni, S. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.097 · Cited by 602
Hall, L. O., Bensaid, A. M., Clarke, L. P., Velthuizen, R. P., Silbiger, M. S., & Bezdek, J. C. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.159057 · Cited by 580
Wisnieff, C., Ramanan, S., Olesik, J., Gauthier, S., Wang, Y., & Pitt, D. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25420 · Cited by 245
Metadata
- Authors
- Bottomley, P. A., Foster, T. H., Argersinger, R. E., & Pfeifer, L. M.
- Venue
- Medical Physics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 425-448
- ISSN
- 0094-2405 (ISSN-L)
- 2473-4209
- OpenAlex
- W2011435635
- Cited by
- 1,192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1118/1.595535
- The paper
- Bottomley, P. A., Foster, T. H., Argersinger, R. E., & Pfeifer, L. M. (1984). A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: Dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. Medical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.