The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time course of clinical change following neurofeedback
Open accessAbstract
Neurofeedback - learning to modulate brain function through real-time monitoring of current brain state - is both a powerful method to perturb and probe brain function and an exciting potential clinical tool. For neurofeedback effects to be useful clinically, they must persist. Here we examine the time course of symptom change following neurofeedback in two clinical populations, combining data from two ongoing neurofeedback studies. This analysis reveals a shared pattern of symptom change, in which symptoms continue to improve for weeks after neurofeedback. This time course has several implications for future neurofeedback studies. Most neurofeedback studies are not designed to test an intervention with this temporal pattern of response. We recommend that new studies incorporate regular follow-up of subjects for weeks or months after the intervention to ensure that the time point of greatest effect is sampled. Furthermore, this time course of continuing clinical change has implications for crossover designs, which may attribute long-term, ongoing effects of real neurofeedback to the control intervention that follows. Finally, interleaving neurofeedback sessions with assessments and examining when clinical improvement peaks may not be an appropriate approach to determine the optimal number of sessions for an application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“however, a general lack of extended follow-up and failure to assess for the emergence of delayed treatment effects is common in the literature [107].”
From Infraslow closed-loop brain training for anxiety and depression (ISAD): a protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial in adult females with internalizing disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [107]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, despite increasing evidence for the maintenance of neural regulatory control acquired during NF trainings in the absence of feedback and for periods of several days (Rance et al., 2018, Yao et al., 2016, Zhao et al., 2019) the transfer of the acquired strategies to everyday life and the perceived efficiency have not been systematically examined in PTSD.”
From Rt-fMRI neurofeedback-guided cognitive reappraisal training modulates amygdala responsivity in posttraumatic stress disorder (2020) · cites this paper as Rance et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hebb, D. O. (2005) · doi:10.4324/9781410612403 · Cited by 9,825
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory
(1950) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1950.02910470083028 · Cited by 4,272
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: II. Validity
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110054008 · Cited by 2,799
The yale global tic severity scale: initial testing of a clinician-rated scale of tic severity
LECKMAN, J. F., RIDDLE, M. A., HARDIN, M. T., ORT, S. I., SWARTZ, K. L., STEVENSON, J., & COHEN, D. J. (1989) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-198907000-00015 · Cited by 2,146
Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback
Sitaram, R., Ros, T., Stoeckel, L., Haller, S., Scharnowski, F., Lewis-Peacock, J., Weiskopf, N., Blefari, M. L., Rana, M., Oblak, E., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.164 · Cited by 1,306
The Molecular and Systems Biology of Memory
Kandel, E. R., Dudai, Y., & Mayford, M. R. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.001 · Cited by 1,134
Control over brain activation and pain learned by using real-time functional MRI
deCharms, R. C., Maeda, F., Glover, G. H., Ludlow, D., Pauly, J. M., Soneji, D., Gabrieli, J. D. E., & Mackey, S. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505210102 · Cited by 876
Selection of Intrinsic Horizontal Connections in the Visual Cortex by Correlated Neuronal Activity
Löwel, S., & Singer, W. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1372754 · Cited by 732
Behavior Therapy for Children With Tourette Disorder
Piacentini, J. C., Woods, D. W., Scahill, L. D., Wilhelm, S., Peterson, A. L., Chang, S. W., Ginsburg, G. S., Deckersbach, T., Dziura, J., Levi-Pearl, S., et al. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.607 · Cited by 722
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mehler, D. M. A., Sokunbi, M. O., Habes, I., Barawi, K., Subramanian, L., Range, M., Evans, J., Hood, K., Lührs, M., Keedwell, P., et al. (2018) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-018-0126-5 · Cited by 175
Kohl, S. H., Mehler, D. M. A., Lührs, M., Thibault, R. T., Konrad, K., & Sorger, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00594 · Cited by 171
fMRI neurofeedback in emotion regulation: A literature review
Linhartová, P., Látalová, A., Kóša, B., Kašpárek, T., Schmahl, C. G., & Paret, C. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.011 · Cited by 162
A systematic review of fMRI neurofeedback reporting and effects in clinical populations
Tursic, A., Eck, J., Lührs, M., Linden, D. E. J., & Goebel, R. (2020) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102496 · Cited by 70
Trambaiolli, L. R., Kohl, S. H., Linden, D. E. J., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.015 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Rance, M., Walsh, C., Sukhodolsky, D. G., Pittman, B., Qiu, M., Kichuk, S. A., Wasylink, S., Koller, W. N., Bloch, M., Gruner, P., Scheinost, D., Pittenger, C., & Hampson, M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hampson, Michelle
- ORCID
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 181
- Pages
- 807-813
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6454268
- OpenAlex
- W2801541300
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH079130, R01 MH095789, R01 MH100068)
- NIRSA Foundation (PCT/US2017/036532)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- neurofeedback, treatment persistence, crossover design
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Tourette Syndrome, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Time Factors, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prefrontal Cortex, Mind-Body Therapies, Neurofeedback, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
