Cited by 41Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with high-density EEG in altered states of consciousness

Napolitani, Martino, Bodart, Olivier, Canali, Paola, Seregni, Francesca, Casali, Adenauer, Laureys, Steven, Rosanova, Mario, Massimini, Marcello +1 more·2014·Brain Injury

Abstract

Background This review discusses the advantages of transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with high-density electroencephalography (TMS-hdEEG) over other current techniques of brain imaging. Methods and results Its application was reviewed, focusing particularly on disorders of consciousness, in the perspective of recent theories of consciousness. Assessment of non-communicative patients with disorders of consciousness remains a clinical challenge and objective measures of the level of consciousness are still needed. Current theories suggest that a key requirement for consciousness is the brain's capacity to rapidly integrate information across different specialized cortical areas. TMS-EEG allows the stimulation of any given cortical area and the recording of the immediate electrical cortical response. This technique has recently been successfully employed to measure changes in brain complexity under physiological, pharmacological and pathological conditions. Conclusions This suggests that TMS-EEG is a reliable tool to discriminate between conscious and unconscious patients at the single subject level. Future works are needed to validate and implement this technique as a clinical tool.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02699052.2014.920524

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is probable that there are transformations available within the brain wherein or is fixed but oi varies.

    “That is, it is probable that there are transformations (as in Equation (9)) available within the brain wherein or is fixed but oi varies.”

    From Falsification and consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as Napolitani et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Napolitani, M., Bodart, O., Canali, P., Seregni, F., Casali, A., Laureys, S., Rosanova, M., Massimini, M., & Gosseries, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Liège (BE)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Gosseries, Olivia
Venue
Brain Injury
Published
2014-08
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
1180-1189
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
OpenAlex
W2046301527
Cited by
41
References
78
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS-EEG, disorders of consciousness, level of consciousness assessment, theory of consciousness, brain complexity, non-communicative patients
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Consciousness Disorders, Electroencephalography, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review