Cited by 48Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input

Open access
Garrett, Douglas D., Epp, Samira M., Kleemeyer, Maike, Lindenberger, Ulman, Polk, Thad A.·2020·NeuroImage

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The extent to which brain responses differ across varying cognitive demands is referred to as "neural differentiation," and greater neural differentiation has been associated with better cognitive performance in older adults. An emerging approach has examined within-person neural differentiation using moment-to-moment brain signal variability. A number of studies have found that brain signal variability differs by cognitive state; however, the factors that cause signal variability to rise or fall on a given task remain understudied. We hypothesized that top performers would modulate signal variability according to the complexity of sensory input, upregulating variability when processing more feature-rich stimuli. In the current study, 46 older adults passively viewed face and house stimuli during fMRI. Low-level analyses showed that house images were more feature-rich than faces, and subsequent computational modelling of ventral visual stream responses (HMAX) revealed that houses were more feature-rich especially in V1/V2-like model layers. Notably, we then found that participants exhibiting greater face-to-house upregulation of brain signal variability in V1/V2 (higher for house relative to face stimuli) also exhibited more accurate, faster, and more consistent behavioral performance on a battery of offline visuo-cognitive tasks. Further, control models revealed that face-house modulation of mean brain signal was relatively insensitive to offline cognition, providing further evidence for the importance of brain signal variability for understanding human behavior. We conclude that the ability to align brain signal variability to the richness of perceptual input may mark heightened trait-level behavioral performance in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116836

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Birn, R., 2012. The Role of Physiological Noise in Resting-State Functional Connectivity NeuroImage, vol. 62, pp. 864-870.
  2. Garrett, D., Epp, S., Perry, A., Lindenberger, U., 2018. Local temporal variability reflects functional network integration in the human brain: on the crucial role of the thalamus. BioRxiv 184739.
  3. Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J.H., 1998. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 1: General Overview. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrett, D. D., Epp, S. M., Kleemeyer, M., Lindenberger, U., & Polk, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Garrett, Douglas D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
217
Pages
116836
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015562985
Cited by
48
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
neuronal differentiation, brain signal variability, older adults, cognitive performance, ventral stream, HMAX model, within-person variability
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review