Amphetamine modulates brain signal variability and working memory in younger and older adults
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Younger, better performing adults typically show greater brain signal variability than older, poorer performers, but the mechanisms underlying this observation remain elusive. We attempt to restore deficient functional-MRI–based blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal variability (SD BOLD ) levels in older adults by boosting dopamine via d -amphetamine (AMPH). Notably, older adults met or exceeded young adult SD BOLD levels under AMPH. AMPH-driven changes in SD BOLD also predicted AMPH-driven changes in reaction time speed and variability on a working memory task, but depended greatly on age and drug administration order. These findings ( i ) suggest that dopamine may account for adult age differences in brain signal variability and ( ii ) highlight the importance of considering practice effects and state dependencies when evaluating the neurochemical basis of age- and cognition-related brain dynamics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In healthy adults, amphetamine increases BOLD signal variability and exerts an equalizing effect on ventral striatum activity during incentive processing.
“In fMRI studies in healthy adults, AMP increased BOLD signal variability (137) and exerted an “equalizing” effect on ventral striatum activity during incentive processing (141).”
From The pharmacology of amphetamine and methylphenidate: Relevance to the neurobiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychiatric comorbidities (2018) · cites this paper as [137]
The citation to this paper is attached to the BOLD-variability claim, not the separate ventral-striatum claim. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that amphetamine increased BOLD signal variability in older adults, but says younger adults showed a mix of increases and decreases, with no net group change. The unqualified claim about healthy adults therefore overgeneralizes the finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282 · see citing works
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500 · see citing works
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · Cited by 21,230 · see citing works
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,010 · see citing works
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,803 · see citing works
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,003 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630 · see citing works
Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 · Cited by 11,314 · see citing works
Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001 · Cited by 10,647 · see citing works
The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
Rosenthal, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 · Cited by 9,068 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To the extent that pharmacological DA studies suffer from the file drawer problem (43), drug administration order may be one culprit in zeroing out inverse behavioral/brain effects resulting from session order.”
BackgroundFaisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883 · see citing works
Neuroimaging studies of working memory:
Wager, T. D., & Smith, E. E. (2003) · Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.3.4.255 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
CONTEXT‐DEPENDENT MEMORY IN TWO NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS: ON LAND AND UNDERWATER
Godden, D., & Baddeley, A. (1975) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x · Cited by 1,686 · see citing works
Inverted-U–Shaped Dopamine Actions on Human Working Memory and Cognitive Control
Cools, R., & D'Esposito, M. (2011) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028 · Cited by 1,673 · see citing works
The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex
Seamans, J. K., & Yang, C. R. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006 · Cited by 1,592 · see citing works
Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares
McIntosh, A. R., Bookstein, F. L., Haxby, J. V., & Grady, C. L. (1996) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0016 · Cited by 1,095 · see citing works
Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory
Vijayraghavan, S., Wang, M., Birnbaum, S. G., Williams, G. V., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1846 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control
Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03015 · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Mattay, V. S., Goldberg, T. E., Fera, F., Hariri, A. R., Tessitore, A., Egan, M. F., Kolachana, B., Callicott, J. H., & Weinberger, D. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0931309100 · Cited by 893 · see citing works
Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation
Li, S., Lindenberger, U., & Sikström, S. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01769-1 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Self-citationThe correlative triad among aging, dopamine, and cognition: Current status and future prospects
Bäckman, L., Nyberg, L. H., Lindenberger, U., Li, S., & Farde, L. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.005 · Cited by 761 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens
Day, J. J., Roitman, M. F., Wightman, R. M., & Carelli, R. M. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1923 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: A next frontier in human brain mapping?
Garrett, D. D., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., MacDonald, S. W. S., Lindenberger, U., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.015 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Importance of Being Variable
Garrett, D. D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5641-10.2011 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Self-citationPractice effects in healthy adults: A longitudinal study on frequent repetitive cognitive testing
Bartels, C., Wegrzyn, M., Wiedl, A., Ackermann, V., & Ehrenreich, H. (2010) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-118 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Human cognitive aging: <i>Corriger la fortune?</i>
Lindenberger, U. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254403 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Self-citationBäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Li, S.-C., & Nyberg, L. (2010) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.008 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Self-citationBlood Oxygen Level-Dependent Signal Variability Is More than Just Noise
Garrett, D. D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5166-09.2010 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Self-citationSelective D2 receptor actions on the functional circuitry of working memory
Wang, M., Vijayraghavan, S., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091162 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
Striatal Dopamine and Working Memory
Landau, S. M., Lal, R., O’Neil, J. P., Baker, S. L., & Jagust, W. J. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn095 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Venton, B. J., Zhang, H., Garris, P. A., Phillips, P. E. M., Sulzer, D., & Wightman, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02109.x · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The Modulation of BOLD Variability between Cognitive States Varies by Age and Processing Speed
Garrett, D. D., Kovacevic, N., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs055 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationDopamine restores reward prediction errors in old age
Chowdhury, R., Guitart‐Masip, M., Lambert, C., Dayan, P., Huys, Q. J. M., Düzel, E., & Dolan, R. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3364 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Dopaminergic control of the striatum for high-level cognition
Cools, R. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.04.002 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Variability in Nucleus Accumbens Activity Mediates Age-Related Suboptimal Financial Risk Taking
Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Kuhnen, C. M., Yoo, D. J., & Knutson, B. D. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4902-09.2010 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Understanding variability in the BOLD signal and why it matters for aging
Grady, C. L., & Garrett, D. D. (2013) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-013-9253-0 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationTwenty-Five Lessons from Computational Neuromodulation
Dayan, P. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.027 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Nagel, I. E., Preuschhof, C., Li, S., Nyberg, L. H., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., & Heekeren, H. R. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21560 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationFarrell, S., Tunbridge, E. M., Braeutigam, S., & Harrison, P. J. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.023 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Dynamic changes in accumbens dopamine correlate with learning during intracranial self-stimulation
Owesson-White, C., Cheer, J. F., Beyene, M., Carelli, R. M., & Wightman, R. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803896105 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Brain Signal Variability is Parametrically Modifiable
Garrett, D. D., McIntosh, A. R., & Grady, C. L. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht150 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citationA neurocomputational model of stochastic resonance and aging
Li, S., von Oertzen, T., & Lindenberger, U. (2005) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2005.06.015 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationWhat Kind of Noise Increases With Age?
Cremer, R., & ZEEF, E. J. (1987) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/42.5.515 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Dopamine controls the firing pattern of dopamine neurons via a network feedback mechanism
Paladini, C. A., Robinson, S., Morikawa, H., Williams, J. T., & Palmiter, R. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0138018100 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Servan-Schreiber, D., Carter, C. S., Bruno, R. M., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00449-6 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Reaction time and nigrostriatal dopamine function: the effects of age and practice
MacRae, P. G., Spirduso, W. W., & Wilcox, R. E. (1988) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(88)90758-5 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Churchill, N. W., & Strother, S. C. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.102 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
A Thalamocorticostriatal Dopamine Network for Psychostimulant-Enhanced Human Cognitive Flexibility
Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Buckholtz, J. W., Cowan, R. L., Woodward, N. D., Li, R., Ansari, M. S., Arrington, C. M., Baldwin, R. M., Smith, C. E., Treadway, M. T., et al. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.032 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Ranaldi, R., & Beninger, R. J. (1993) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/bf02244342 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Dopamine modulates processing speed in the human mesolimbic system
Eckart, C., & Bunzeck, N. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.001 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Performance of a motor task learned on levodopa deteriorates when subsequently practiced off
Anderson, E., Horak, F. B., Lasarev, M. R., et al. (2013) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.25702 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Mattay VS, et al. (2003) Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(10):6186-6191.
- Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) FSL. Neu- roimage 62(2):782-790.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faraone, S. V. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.02.001 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Brain Signal Variability Differentially Affects Cognitive Flexibility and Cognitive Stability
Armbruster-Genç, D. J. N., Ueltzhöffer, K., & Fiebach, C. J. (2016) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2517-14.2016 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Higher performers upregulate brain signal variability in response to more feature-rich visual input
Garrett, D. D., Epp, S. M., Kleemeyer, M., Lindenberger, U., & Polk, T. A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116836 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationMoment-to-Moment Brain Signal Variability Reliably Predicts Psychiatric Treatment Outcome
Månsson, K. N. T., Waschke, L., Manzouri, A., Furmark, T., Fischer, H., & Garrett, D. D. (2022) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.026 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationKassim, F. M. (2023) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.2856 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Another fMRI study has shown that dexamphetamine‐induced dopamine release in older healthy individuals increased brain signal variability during the WM task, comparable to or exceeding the brain signal variability young adults had in the placebo condition (Garrett et al., 2015).”
- Authors
- Garrett, D. D., Nagel, I. E., Preuschhof, C., Burzynska, A. Z., Marchner, J., Wiegert, S., Jungehülsing, G. J., Nyberg, L., Villringer, A., Li, S.-C., Heekeren, H. R., Bäckman, L., & Lindenberger, U.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Klinik für Neurologie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus, 13347 Berlin, Germany;
- Umeå University (SE)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 7593-7598
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4475975
- OpenAlex
- W2134174619
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (Intramural Innovation Fund)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (N/A)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz Award)
- Vetenskapsrådet (N/A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- amphetamine, brain signal variability, BOLD signal variability, working memory, cognitive aging, practice effects, reaction time variability, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Brain, Dextroamphetamine, Dopamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Multivariate Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review