Cited by 287Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingCellular transport and secretion

Differential regulation of AMPA receptor subunit trafficking by palmitoylation of two distinct sites

Open access
Hayashi, Takashi, Rumbaugh, Gavin, Huganir, Richard L.·2005·Neuron

Abstract

Modification of AMPA receptor function is a major mechanism for the regulation of synaptic transmission and underlies several forms of synaptic plasticity. Post-translational palmitoylation is a reversible modification that regulates localization of many proteins. Here, we report that palmitoylation of the AMPA receptor regulates receptor trafficking. All AMPA receptor subunits are palmitoylated on two cysteine residues in their transmembrane domain (TMD) 2 and in their C-terminal region. Palmitoylation on TMD 2 is upregulated by the palmitoyl acyl transferase GODZ and leads to an accumulation of the receptor in the Golgi and a reduction of receptor surface expression. C-terminal palmitoylation decreases interaction of the AMPA receptor with the 4.1N protein and regulates AMPA- and NMDA-induced AMPA receptor internalization. Moreover, depalmitoylation of the receptor is regulated by activation of glutamate receptors. These data suggest that regulated palmitoylation of AMPA receptor subunits modulates receptor trafficking and may be important for synaptic plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.06.035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All four AMPAR subunits are palmitoylated at a conserved cysteine residue in the C-terminal juxtamembrane region and a second site within transmembrane domain TM2.

    “All four AMPAR subunits are palmitoylated at a conserved cysteine residue in the C-terminal juxtamembrane region (GluA1 C811, GluA2 C836, GluA3 C841, GluA4 C817) and a second site within the transmembrane domain TM2 (Hayashi et al., 2005).”

    From The AMPA Receptor Code of Synaptic Plasticity (2018) · cites this paper as Hayashi et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayashi, T., Rumbaugh, G., & Huganir, R. L.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Huganir, Richard L.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
709-723
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138136052
Cited by
287
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
AMPA receptors, palmitoylation, receptor trafficking, post-translational modification, transmembrane domain 2, receptor internalization, depalmitoylation, glutamate receptor activation, Golgi retention, synaptic plasticity, synaptic transmission
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Golgi Apparatus, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Membrane Potentials, Membrane Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Synaptic Transmission, Palmitic Acids, Receptors, Cell Surface, Transfection, Receptors, AMPA, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Glutamic Acid, Immunoprecipitation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review