The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Manipulation of Preference in the Human Brain
Open accessAbstract
Our preferences are influenced by what other people like, but depend critically on how we feel about those people, a classical psychological effect called "cognitive balance." Here, we manipulated preferences for goods by telling participants the preferences of strongly liked or disliked groups of other people. Participants' preferences converged to those of the liked group, but diverged from the disliked group. Activation of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) tracked the discrepancy between one's own preference and its social ideal and was associated with subsequent preference change (toward the liked and away from the disliked group), even several months later. A follow-up study found overlapping activation in this same region of dmPFC with negative monetary outcomes, but no overlap with nearby activations induced by response conflict. A single social encounter can thus result in long-lasting preference change, a mechanism that recruits dmPFC and that may reflect the aversive nature of cognitive imbalance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, striatum activity is greater when we see that the popular opinion agrees rather than disagrees with our own evaluation of an object 44, 45, and is related to our current evaluation of an object after we have seen the popular opinion 46, 47.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“That is, ventral striatum activity increased when other people with good reputations agreed with a participants’ evaluation, but other brain regions, including medial prefrontal cortex, predicted changes to participants’ opinions rather than ventral striatum 45.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Other research shows, however, that ventral striatum activity while viewing other people's evaluations is not necessarily related to social conformity 45, or even related to independence from conformity49.”
From The social brain and reward: Social information processing in the human striatum (2014) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
The Handbook of Social Psychology
Gravatt, A. E., Lindzey, G. E., & Aronson, F. (1969) · The Family Coordinator · doi:10.2307/582242 · Cited by 12,518
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
Attitudes and cognitive organization
Heider, F. (1946) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275 · Cited by 3,672
Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex
Etkin, A., Egner, T., & Kalisch, R. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.11.004 · Cited by 3,059 · cited 8×
“The Neural Correlates of Cognitive Balance and S1C), the fact that among all regions related to cognitive balance, the dmPFC activation was the most strongly associated with preference change both immediately after social feedback as well as 4 months later suggests that the dmPFC plays a pivotal role in adjusting one'…”
InfluentialThe role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100301 · Cited by 2,974
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616645673 · Cited by 627
Back to the Future of Dissonance Theory: Cognitive Consistency as a Core Motive
Gawronski, B. (2012) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.652 · Cited by 342
Herding Brains: A Core Neural Mechanism for Social Alignment
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Saporta, N., Marton-Alper, I. Z., & Gvirts, H. Z. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.002 · Cited by 289
Integrating Empathy and Interpersonal Emotion Regulation
Zaki, J. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050830 · Cited by 291
Pearce, M. T., Zaidel, D. W., Vartanian, O. A., Skov, M., Leder, H., Chatterjee, A. K., & Nadal, M. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615621274 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Izuma, K., & Adolphs, R.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Izuma, Keise
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3695714
- OpenAlex
- W1971597000
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Tamagawa University
- National Science Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- cognitive balance, preference change, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, conformity, social ideals, monetary outcomes, response conflict
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Conflict, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Prefrontal Cortex, Behavior Control, Functional Neuroimaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
