Cited by 627Impact of Technology on AdolescentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDigital Media and Philosophy

The Power of the Like in Adolescence: Effects of Peer Influence on Neural and Behavioral Responses to Social Media

Open access
Sherman, Lauren E., Payton, Ashley A., Hernandez, Leanna M., Greenfield, Patricia M., Dapretto, Mirella·2016·Psychological Science

Abstract

We investigated a unique way in which adolescent peer influence occurs on social media. We developed a novel functional MRI (fMRI) paradigm to simulate Instagram, a popular social photo-sharing tool, and measured adolescents' behavioral and neural responses to likes, a quantifiable form of social endorsement and potential source of peer influence. Adolescents underwent fMRI while viewing photos ostensibly submitted to Instagram. They were more likely to like photos depicted with many likes than photos with few likes; this finding showed the influence of virtual peer endorsement and held for both neutral photos and photos of risky behaviors (e.g., drinking, smoking). Viewing photos with many (compared with few) likes was associated with greater activity in neural regions implicated in reward processing, social cognition, imitation, and attention. Furthermore, when adolescents viewed risky photos (as opposed to neutral photos), activation in the cognitive-control network decreased. These findings highlight possible mechanisms underlying peer influence during adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797616645673

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Galvan A Hare TA Parra CE Penn J Voss K Glover G Casey BJ 2006 Earlier development of the accumbens relative to orbitofrontal cortex might underlie risk-taking behavior in adolescents The Journal of Neuroscience 26 25 6885 6892 16793895 PMC6673830
  2. Jenkinson M Beckmann CF Behrens TE Woolrich MW Smith SM 2012 FSL Neuroimage 62 2 782 790 21979382

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, L. E., Payton, A. A., Hernandez, L. M., Greenfield, P. M., & Dapretto, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sherman, Lauren E.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
27
Issue
7
Pages
1027-1035
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2415638773
Cited by
627
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
102.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od011939-01a1)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31DA038578)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR015431, C06RR012169)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
peer influence, adolescents, social media, Instagram, likes, social endorsement, risk-taking, reward processing, imitation, cognitive control, social cognition, neural responses
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Brain, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Reward, Risk-Taking, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review