Cited by 228Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Temporal Specification and Bilaterality of Human Neocortical Topographic Gene Expression

Open access
Pletikos, Mihovil, Sousa, André M.M., Sedmak, Goran, Meyer, Kyle A., Zhu, Ying, Cheng, Feng, Li, Mingfeng, Kawasawa, Yuka Imamura +1 more·2014·Neuron

Abstract

Transcriptional events involved in the development of human cerebral neocortex are poorly understood. Here, we analyzed the temporal dynamics and laterality of gene expression in human and macaque monkey neocortex. We found that interareal differences exhibit a temporal hourglass pattern, dividing the human neocortical development into three major phases. The first phase, corresponding to prenatal development, is characterized by the highest number of differential expressed genes among areas and gradient-like expression patterns, including those that are different between human and macaque. The second, preadolescent phase, is characterized by lesser interareal expression differences and by an increased synchronization of areal transcriptomes. During the third phase, from adolescence onward, differential expression among areas increases again driven predominantly by a subset of areas, without obvious gradient-like patterns. Analyses of left-right gene expression revealed population-level global symmetry throughout the fetal and postnatal time span. Thus, human neocortical topographic gene expression is temporally specified and globally symmetric.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.018

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PFC, Broca area, and Wernicke area in humans display a temporarily enriched gene expression pattern distinct from mouse or macaque cerebrum at comparable prenatal stages.

    “Thus, the PFC as well as the Broca and Wernicke association areas in humans, which are formed in the frontal and temporal lobes, display a temporarily enriched gene expression pattern that is distinct from the mice or macaque cerebrum at the comparable prenatal stages (e.g., [21, 22]).”

    From Development of prefrontal cortex (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The section “Temporal Transcriptional Hourglass Pattern Reflects Putative Areal and Functional Differences” reports fetal expression patterns enriched in prefrontal/frontal and temporal regions. “Certain Prenatal Expression Patterns Differ between Human and Macaque” reports that some selected genes have different areal expression patterns in humans and macaques at equivalent ages. Our copy does not establish this specifically for all three named areas—PFC, Broca area, and Wernicke area—or make the claimed prenatal comparison with mice. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The basic structural and functional framework of the human brain is in place by the second year of life and perhaps earlier.

    “These studies, along with more recent postmortem histological and gene-expression studies7, 8 (Box 1), suggest that the basic structural and functional framework of the human brain is in place by the second year of life and perhaps even earlier.”
  • Prenatal cortical development is characterized by robust regional differences in gene expression that are probably crucial for establishing area-specific subcortical-cortical and cortico-cortical projections.

    “prenatal cortical development is characterized by robust regional differences in gene expression that are probably crucial for establishing area-specific subcortical-cortical and cortico-cortical projections8.”
  • Infancy and early childhood are characterized by relatively minimal differences in gene expression across cortical areas, as general neuronal and glial differentiation transcription programmes are initiated.

    “infancy and early childhood are characterized by relatively minimal differences in gene expression across cortical areas, as more ‘general’ neuronal and glial differentiation transcription programmes are initiated8.”
  • Fetal gene co-expression modules with prominent differential patterns among areas and gradient-like expression patterns also displayed divergence between humans and rhesus macaques, suggesting a possible role for differences in neocortical topographic patterns of gene expression in evolution of neural circuitry.

    “Interestingly, the fetal gene co-expression modules that showed prominent differential patterns among areas and gradient-like expression patterns (Figure 5D–G), particularly during fetal development, also displayed divergence between humans and rhesus macaques (Figures 5H–K) (Pletikos et al., 2014), suggesting a possible role for differences in neocortical topographic patterns of gene expression”

    From The Cellular and Molecular Landscapes of the Developing Human Central Nervous System (2016) · cites this paper as Pletikos et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 228

Authors
Pletikos, M., Sousa, A. M. M., Sedmak, G., Meyer, K. A., Zhu, Y., Cheng, F., Li, M., Kawasawa, Y. I., & Šestan, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Zagreb (HR)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Šestan, Nenad
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
81
Issue
2
Pages
321-332
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985806334
Cited by
228
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1122492)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (09.01/414)
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (RC2MH089929, MH081896, MH089929, U01MH081896)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U24NS051869, NS051869)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
human neocortex, cortical development, temporal dynamics, left-right symmetry, differential gene expression, macaque, prenatal development, adolescent development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fetus, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Functional Laterality, Macaca mulatta, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Species Specificity, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Neocortex, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis, Gene Regulatory Networks, Young Adult, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review