Cited by 343Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesComplex Network Analysis TechniquesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cooperative and Competitive Spreading Dynamics on the Human Connectome

Open access

Abstract

Increasingly detailed data on the network topology of neural circuits create a need for theoretical principles that explain how these networks shape neural communication. Here we use a model of cascade spreading to reveal architectural features of human brain networks that facilitate spreading. Using an anatomical brain network derived from high-resolution diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), we investigate scenarios where perturbations initiated at seed nodes result in global cascades that interact either cooperatively or competitively. We find that hub regions and a backbone of pathways facilitate early spreading, while the shortest path structure of the connectome enables cooperative effects, accelerating the spread of cascades. Finally, competing cascades become integrated by converging on polysensory associative areas. These findings show that the organizational principles of brain networks shape global communication and facilitate integrative function.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.035

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 343

Metadata

Authors
Mišić, B., Betzel, R. F., Nematzadeh, A., Goñi, J., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P., Flammini, A., Ahn, Y.-Y., & Sporns, O.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Sporns, Olaf
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
1518-1529
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155847838
Cited by
342
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 6
FWCI
20.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30AG010133, P30 AG-10133)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
human connectome, global cascades, brain network architecture, diffusion spectrum imaging, hub regions, neural communication, network topology
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Competitive Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Nonlinear Dynamics, Young Adult, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review