Cited by 306Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Critical Role of Histone Turnover in Neuronal Transcription and Plasticity

Open access
Maze, Ian, Wenderski, Wendy, Noh, Kyung-Min, Bagot, Rosemary C., Tzavaras, Nikos, Purushothaman, Immanuel, Elsässer, Simon J., Guo, Yin +18 more·2015·Neuron

Abstract

Turnover and exchange of nucleosomal histones and their variants, a process long believed to be static in post-replicative cells, remains largely unexplored in brain. Here, we describe a novel mechanistic role for HIRA (histone cell cycle regulator) and proteasomal degradation-associated histone dynamics in the regulation of activity-dependent transcription, synaptic connectivity, and behavior. We uncover a dramatic developmental profile of nucleosome occupancy across the lifespan of both rodents and humans, with the histone variant H3.3 accumulating to near-saturating levels throughout the neuronal genome by mid-adolescence. Despite such accumulation, H3.3-containing nucleosomes remain highly dynamic-in a modification-independent manner-to control neuronal- and glial-specific gene expression patterns throughout life. Manipulating H3.3 dynamics in both embryonic and adult neurons confirmed its essential role in neuronal plasticity and cognition. Our findings establish histone turnover as a critical and previously undocumented regulator of cell type-specific transcription and plasticity in mammalian brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.014

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differential splicing events in ASD cortex are significantly enriched in events previously shown to be regulated by neuronal activity.

    “Indeed, differential splicing events were significantly enriched in those previously shown to be regulated by neuronal activity21 (Fig. 1h).”
  • Covalent modifications of DNA and some histone proteins in post-mitotic neurons can persist for months to years.

    “covalent modifications of DNA and some histone proteins in post-mitotic neurons can persist for months to years (Maze et al., 2015).”

    From Single-Cell Sequencing of Brain Cell Transcriptomes and Epigenomes (2021) · cites this paper as Maze et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maze, I., Wenderski, W., Noh, K.-M., Bagot, R. C., Tzavaras, N., Purushothaman, I., Elsässer, S. J., Guo, Y., Ionete, C., Hurd, Y. L., Tamminga, C. A., Halene, T., Farrelly, L., Soshnev, A. A., Wen, D., Rafii, S., Birtwistle, M. R., Akbarian, S., Buchholz, B. A., Blitzer, R. D., Nestler, E. J., Yuan, Z.-F., Garcia, B. A., Shen, L., Molina, H., & Allis, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
  • Maze, Ian
  • Allis, C. David
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
77-94
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1579352208
Cited by
306
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 8
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (5R01 MH094698, P50 MH096890)
  • NIH (R21MH102679, RO1GM110174, 8P41GM103483)
  • US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (DE-AC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-653296)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
histone turnover, histone H3.3, histone variants, synaptic plasticity, nucleosome occupancy, HIRA, proteasomal degradation, activity-dependent gene expression, cognitive function, brain development, cell type-specific gene expression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Animals, Brain, Cerebellum, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromatin, Female, Fetus, Frontal Lobe, Hippocampus, Histones, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Nucleosomes, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review