Interactionist Neuroscience
Open accessAbstract
We argue that bidirectional interaction between animal and human studies is essential for understanding the human brain. The revolution in meso-scale study of circuits in non-human species provides a historical opportunity. However, to fully realize its potential requires integration with human neuroscience. We describe three strategies for successful interactionist neuroscience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is very hard to infer the mapping between the behavior of a system and its lower-level properties by only looking at the lower-level properties.
“it is very hard to infer the mapping between the behavior of a system and its lower-level properties by only looking at the lower-level properties”
From Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias (2017) · cites this paper as Badre et al., 2015
Cites
A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning
Montague, P., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996 · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory
D'Esposito, M., & Postle, B. R. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031 · Cited by 1,653 · see citing works
Pattern separation in the hippocampus
Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. L. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 · Cited by 1,544 · see citing works
Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade‐off
O'Reilly, R. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1994) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.450040605 · Cited by 914 · see citing works
Arrowsmith, J. (2011) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3439 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Collins, A. G. E., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037015 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational perspectives on dopamine function in prefrontal cortex
Cohen, J. D., Braver, T. S., & Brown, J. W. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00314-8 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Progress and challenges in probing the human brain
Poldrack, R. A., & Farah, M. J. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15692 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Multiple gates on working memory
Chatham, C. H., & Badre, D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2014.08.001 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Introduction to Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience
Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2236-9 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Jones, S. R., Pritchett, D. L., Stufflebeam, S. M., Hämäläinen, M., & Moore, C. I. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0482-07.2007 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural dynamics and circuit mechanisms of decision-making
Wang, X. (2012) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.006 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The Challenge of Connecting the Dots in the B.R.A.I.N.
Devor, A., Bandettini, P. A., Boas, D. A., Bower, J. M., Buxton, R. B., Cohen, L. B., Dale, A. M., Einevoll, G. T., Fox, P. T., Franceschini, M. A., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.008 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
How cognitive theory guides neuroscience
Frank, M. J., & Badre, D. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.009 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias
Krakauer, J. W., Ghazanfar, A. A., Gomez-Marin, A., MacIver, M. A., & Poeppel, D. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041 · Cited by 1,358 · see citing works
Neymotin, S. A., Daniels, D. S., Caldwell, B., McDougal, R. A., Carnevale, N. T., Jas, M., Moore, C. I., Hines, M. L., Hämäläinen, M., & Jones, S. R. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.51214 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationMenon, V., Cerri, D., Lee, B., Yuan, R., Lee, S.-H., & Shih, Y.-Y. I. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36616-8 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Aylward, J., Hales, C., Robinson, E., & Robinson, O. J. (2020) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718004117 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Badre, D., Frank, M. J., & Moore, C. I.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Badre, David
- Venue
- Neuron
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 855-860
- ISSN
- 0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233747291
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neuron (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- human-animal relations, human brain, translational neuroscience, comparative neuroscience
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Biological Evolution, Humans, Neurosciences, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
