Cited by 91Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Abundant Aβ fibrils in ultracentrifugal supernatants of aqueous extracts from Alzheimer’s disease brains

Open access
Stern, Andrew M., Yang, Yang, Jin, Shanxue, Yamashita, Keitaro, Meunier, Angela L., Liu, Wen, Cai, Yuqi, Ericsson, Maria +4 more·2023·Neuron

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Soluble oligomers of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) have been defined as aggregates in supernatants following ultracentrifugation of aqueous extracts from Alzheimer's disease (AD) brains and are believed to be upstream initiators of synaptic dysfunction, but little is known about their structures. We now report the unexpected presence of Aβ fibrils in synaptotoxic high-speed supernatants from AD brains extracted by soaking in an aqueous buffer. The fibrils did not appear to form during preparation, and their counts by EM correlated with Aβ ELISA quantification. Cryo-EM structures of aqueous Aβ fibrils were identical to those from sarkosyl-insoluble homogenates. The fibrils in aqueous extracts were labeled by lecanemab, an Aβ aggregate-directed antibody reported to improve AD cognitive outcomes. Lecanemab provided protection against aqueous fibril synaptotoxicity. We conclude that fibrils are abundant in aqueous extracts from AD brains and have the same structures as those from plaques. These findings have implications for AD pathogenesis and drug design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.007

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The size of aggregates between 20 nm and 200 nm is consistent with the reported size of synaptotoxic amyloid beta aggregates from human Alzheimer's disease brains.

    “consistent with the reported size of synaptotoxic Aβ aggregates from human AD brains [32]”

    From Selective suppression of oligodendrocyte-derived amyloid beta rescues neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Results (p. 9) indicate that most Aβ assemblies in fresh AD-brain extracts were at least 20 nm, and the Discussion (p. 13) reports that similarly prepared extracts impair synaptic plasticity. The paper does not report a 20–200 nm size range for synaptotoxic aggregates or establish that the measured fibrils themselves cause the synaptic effects; it proposes that partial fibril disassembly may be required for neurotoxicity. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Effects of amyloid beta on neuronal activity and synaptic function often stem from soluble aggregates similar to those produced in much greater numbers by oligodendrocytes.

    “Rather than being plaque dependent, the effects of Aβ on neuronal activity and synaptic function often stem from soluble aggregates similar to those we see produced in much greater numbers by oligodendrocytes [32,39].”

    From Selective suppression of oligodendrocyte-derived amyloid beta rescues neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Introduction (p. 3) reports that soluble Aβ assemblies disrupt synaptic plasticity, and the Discussion (p. 13) reports neurotoxic effects of comparable aqueous brain extracts. The paper does not establish that these effects are independent of plaques: the Discussion says diffusible fibrils may be in equilibrium with plaques. The oligodendrocyte comparison is framed as the citing authors’ own observation, not a finding attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stern, A. M., Yang, Y., Jin, S., Yamashita, K., Meunier, A. L., Liu, W., Cai, Y., Ericsson, M., Liu, L., Goedert, M., Scheres, S. H. W., & Selkoe, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Selkoe, Dennis J.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
111
Issue
13
Pages
2012-2020.e4
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376225808
Cited by
91
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (RF1AG006173, K08NS128329, P01AG015379)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_U105184291)
  • Prothena
  • Alzheimer's Association (AACSF-21-849687)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta fibrils, Alzheimer's disease, synaptotoxicity, lecanemab, amyloid oligomers, fibril structure, cryo-electron microscopy, amyloid plaques, synaptic dysfunction, amyloid fibril formation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Humans, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review