Cited by 60Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism

Plasma and brain concentrations of oral therapeutic doses of methylphenidate and their impact on brain monoamine content in mice

Open access
Balcioglu, Aygul, Ren, Jia-Qian, McCarthy, Deirdre, Spencer, Thomas J., Biederman, Joseph, Bhide, Pradeep G.·2009·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Methylphenidate is a frequently prescribed stimulant for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). An important assumption in the animal models that have been employed to study methylphenidate's effects on the brain and behavior is that bioavailability of methylphenidate in the animal models reflects that in human subjects. From this perspective, the dose and route of administration of methylphenidate assume critical importance because both these factors likely influence rate of uptake, plasma and brain concentrations of the drug. In the present study, plasma and brain concentrations of d- and l-methylphenidate and d- and l-ritalinic acid were measured in 2-month old mice (equivalent to young adulthood in humans) following a single oral administration of a racemic mixture. Our data show that oral administration of 0.75 mg/kg dose produced within 15 min, plasma levels of d-methylphenidate that correspond to the clinically effective plasma levels in human subjects (estimated to be 6-10 ng/ml). Brain concentrations of d- and l-methylphenidate tended to exceed their plasma concentrations, while the plasma concentrations of d- and l-ritalinic acid exceeded their brain concentrations. A single oral administration at 0.75 mg/kg dose increased dopamine content of the frontal cortex within 1 h, without producing statistically significant changes in serotonin or noradrenaline contents. Striatal monoamine levels remained unaltered. These data highlight disparities between plasma and brain concentrations of methylphenidate and its metabolites following oral administration and illustrate brain region- and monoamine-specific changes produced by the low oral dose of methylphenidate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.025

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The increase of IFG/insula activation with methylphenidate is likely mediated by both noradrenergic and dopaminergic mechanisms.

    “The increase of IFG/insula activation with methylphenidate is likely mediated by both noradrenergic and dopaminergic mechanisms, given that in frontal regions both in humans 15, 69, 70 and in animals 69, 70 methylphenidate increases noradrenaline equally or more than dopamine via reuptake inhibition of noradrenaline transporters, which clear both catecholamines.”

    From Effects of stimulants on brain function in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2014) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Results report increased frontal-cortex dopamine content in mice after methylphenidate, supporting a dopaminergic effect. The Discussion says noradrenaline showed no significant tissue change and cautions that tissue measurements cannot establish neurotransmitter release. The paper does not assess IFG/insula activation or establish the proposed dual mechanism through noradrenaline transporters. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balcioglu, A., Ren, J.-Q., McCarthy, D., Spencer, T. J., Biederman, J., & Bhide, P. G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bhide, Pradeep G.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
57
Issue
7-8
Pages
687-693
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038002445
Cited by
60
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020796)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS043426, P30NS045776)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Keywords
methylphenidate, ritalinic acid, plasma drug concentration, brain drug concentration, oral administration, bioavailability, dopamine, frontal cortex, striatum, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, mice
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Biological Availability, Brain, Corpus Striatum, Frontal Lobe, Male, Methylphenidate, Plasma, Stereoisomerism, Biogenic Monoamines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review