Cited by 5Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyIon channel regulation and function

Activation of G protein gated inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels in keratinocytes mediates peripheral kappa opioid receptor-mediated antinociception

Open access
Pando, Miryam M., Debner, Emily K., Jacobs, Blaine A., Jamshidi, Raehannah J., Jennings, Elaine M., Clarke, William P., Berg, Kelly A.·2025·Neuropharmacology

Abstract

Kappa opioid receptors (KOR) expressed by peripheral pain-sensing neurons (nociceptors) are a promising target for development of effective and safer analgesics for inflammatory pain that are devoid of central nervous system adverse effects. Here we sought to delineate the signaling pathways that underlie peripheral KOR-mediated antinociception in adult male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. In an inflammatory model of pain, local intraplantar (i.pl.) injection of pertussis toxin prevented antinociception induced by the KOR agonist, U50488, indicating that members of the Gi/o family mediate the antinociceptive response. Furthermore, i.pl. injection of the G protein-coupled inward-rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel blocker, TPNQ, as well as GIRK2 subunit-targeted siRNA abolished U50488-mediated antinociceptive behavioral responses in both male and female rats. Consistent with these data, i.pl. injection of ML297, a direct activator of GIRK1 subunit-containing channels, elicited peripheral antinociceptive behavior. It is well known that intraepidermal nerve fibers (IENF) that innervate the hindpaw propagate nociceptive signals to the spinal cord. However, recent studies suggest that keratinocytes, the major cell type in the epidermis, also play an active role in pain and sensory processing. Results from RT-qPCR, RNAscope and immunohistochemistry experiments confirmed that both KOR and GIRK are expressed in keratinocytes in the epidermal layer of the rat hindpaw. Knockdown of either KOR or GIRK2 subunits selectively in keratinocytes by i.pl. injection of shRNA plasmids, prevented the antinociceptive response to U50488. Taken together, these data suggest that KOR-mediated activation of GIRK channels in keratinocytes is required for peripherally-mediated antinociception.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110326

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A GIRK1-selective opener and other direct activators hyperpolarize hippocampal pyramidal neurons and reduce seizure susceptibility.

    “a GIRK1-selective opener and other direct activators hyperpolarize hippocampal pyramidal neurons and reduce seizure susceptibility”

    From Synaptic Plasticity—Intrinsic Excitability and Antidepressant Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [308]

    The Results section ('Direct activation of GIRK channels produces a robust antinociceptive response'; page unavailable) reports that the direct GIRK activator ML297 affected pain responses in rats. The Discussion describes neuronal hyperpolarization following receptor-mediated GIRK activation, and a reference title reports antiepileptic properties of ML297 in mice. Our copy does not establish that a GIRK1-selective opener or other direct activators hyperpolarize hippocampal pyramidal neurons and reduce seizure susceptibility. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pando, M. M., Debner, E. K., Jacobs, B. A., Jamshidi, R. J., Jennings, E. M., Clarke, W. P., & Berg, K. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Berg, Kelly A.
Venue
Neuropharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
268
Pages
110326
ISSN
0028-3908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406853069
Cited by
5
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropharmacology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS082145)
  • NIH National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM106035)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA038645)
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (TST128233)
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
kappa opioid receptor, G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels, keratinocytes, antinociception, inflammatory pain, nociceptors, Gi/o proteins, pertussis toxin, U50,488, GIRK2, GIRK1, intraepidermal nerve fibers, epidermis, analgesic targets
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Animals, Female, Male, Pain, Keratinocytes, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, 3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer, Pertussis Toxin, Rats, G Protein-Coupled Inwardly-Rectifying Potassium Channels, Nociception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review