Cited by 51Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical practice of rTMS reveals a functional dissociation between agency and hallucinations in schizophrenia

Jardri, Renaud, Delevoye-Turrell, Yvonne, Lucas, Bernard, Pins, Delphine, Bulot, Virginie, Delmaire, Christine, Thomas, Pierre, Delion, Pierre, Goeb, Jean-Louis·2009·Neuropsychologia

Abstract

We report here the case of a hospitalized 11 year-old boy (YP) with a positive diagnosis of 'Childhood Onset Schizophrenia'. YP experienced verbal-auditory hallucinations, a delusion of alien control and hetero-aggressive behaviour. Antipsychotic drugs were unsuccessful and furthermore provoked severe acute dystonia. fMRI-guided rTMS applied over several cortical regions provided the means to reveal for the first time a functional dissociation between auditory-verbal hallucinations and agency. These results demonstrate the efficacy of rTMS for young patients suffering from drug-resistant hallucinations but they furthermore question the physiopathology of the hallucinatory process by suggesting that agency and hallucinations may be sub-served by different neural networks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.006

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 34 references

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 51

Metadata

Authors
Jardri, R., Delevoye-Turrell, Y., Lucas, B., Pins, D., Bulot, V., Delmaire, C., Thomas, P., Delion, P., & Goeb, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
Corresponding author
Jardri, Renaud
Venue
Neuropsychologia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
132-138
ISSN
0028-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155906408
Cited by
51
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • LillOA (Université de Lille (University Of Lille)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, childhood schizophrenia, auditory verbal hallucinations, agency, functional dissociation
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Child, Dissociative Disorders, Electric Stimulation, Hallucinations, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Schizophrenia, Childhood, Schizophrenic Psychology, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review