Cited by 60Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchSleep and Wakefulness Research

Induction of long-term potentiation leads to increased reliability of evoked neocortical spindles in vivo

Werk, C.M., Harbour, V.L., Chapman, C.A.·2005·Neuroscience

Abstract

Large amplitude electroencephalographic spindle waves (7-14 Hz) occur spontaneously in the neocortex during both sleep and awake immobility, and it has been proposed that synchronous neuronal activation during spindles may contribute to learning-related synaptic plasticity. Spindles can also be evoked in the sensorimotor cortex by electrical stimulation of cortical or thalamic inputs in the rat. To determine if strengthening cortical synapses can affect the initiation and maintenance of electrically evoked spindles, stimulation pulses were delivered at a range of intensities to the corpus callosum or ventrolateral thalamus in the awake rat before and after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) by tetanization of the corpus callosum. The morphology of evoked spindles was similar to that of naturally occurring spindles. Spindles were evoked less reliably during slow-wave sleep than during waking, and this was correlated with smaller synaptic responses during slow-wave sleep. Similar to previous findings, daily tetanization of the corpus callosum for 15 days decreased the early component and increased the late component of synaptic responses evoked by corpus callosum stimulation, but did not significantly affect synaptic responses evoked by thalamic stimulation. Similarly, LTP induction increased the reliability with which low-intensity corpus callosum stimulation evoked spindles, but increases in spindles evoked by thalamic stimulation were not significant. Synaptic pot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo, synchronous spindle activity occurred more reliably in neocortical synaptic networks that had been previously potentiated through tetanic stimulation.

    “In vivo, synchronous spindle activity occurred more reliably in neocortical synaptic networks that had been previously potentiated through tetanic stimulation (1315).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1315]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Werk, C. M., Harbour, V. L., & Chapman, C. A.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Chapman, C.A.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
131
Issue
4
Pages
793-800
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085829786
Cited by
60
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
long-term potentiation, slow-wave sleep, synaptic plasticity, corpus callosum, ventrolateral thalamic nucleus, tetanization, sensorimotor cortex, layer V neurons, synaptic potentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Corpus Callosum, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Male, Sleep, Somatosensory Cortex, Wakefulness, Long-Term Potentiation, Neocortex, Rats, Long-Evans, Ventral Thalamic Nuclei, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review