Cited by 478Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Sleep spindle activity is associated with the integration of new memories and existing knowledge

Open access
Tamminen, Jakke, Payne, Jessica D., Stickgold, Robert, Wamsley, Erin J., Gaskell, M. Gareth·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Sleep spindle activity has been associated with improvements in procedural and declarative memory. Here, for the first time, we looked at the role of spindles in the integration of newly learned information with existing knowledge, contrasting this with explicit recall of the new information. Two groups of participants learned novel spoken words (e.g., cathedruke) that overlapped phonologically with familiar words (e.g., cathedral). The sleep group was exposed to the novel words in the evening, followed by an initial test, a polysomnographically monitored night of sleep, and a second test in the morning. The wake group was exposed and initially tested in the morning and spent a retention interval of similar duration awake. Finally, both groups were tested a week later at the same circadian time to control for possible circadian effects. In the sleep group, participants recalled more words and recognized them faster after sleep, whereas in the wake group such changes were not observed until the final test 1 week later. Following acquisition of the novel words, recognition of the familiar words was slowed in both groups, but only after the retention interval, indicating that the novel words had been integrated into the mental lexicon following consolidation. Importantly, spindle activity was associated with overnight lexical integration in the sleep group, but not with gains in recall rate or recognition speed of the novel words themselves. Spindle activity appears to be particularly important for overnight integration of new memories with existing neocortical knowledge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3028-10.2010

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep impacts students' neurocognitive functions, including memory consolidation, attentional integration, and executive functions, affecting their performance in complex tasks.

    “Second, sleep impacts students’ neurocognitive functions, including memory consolidation (Tamminen et al., 2010), attentional integration, and executive functions (Maquet, 2001), affecting their performance in complex tasks.”
  • The effect of sleep on integration of spoken words is associated with increased spindle activity.

    “Thus, in adults and children, sleep promoted the integration of newly learned spoken words into existing knowledge networks as measured by a lexical competition task (333, 334, 530; but see Ref. 735), with this effect being associated with increased spindle activity (1175).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [1175]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamminen, J., Payne, J. D., Stickgold, R., Wamsley, E. J., & Gaskell, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
30
Issue
43
Pages
14356-14360
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1987662024
Cited by
478
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 28
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH48,832)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/E015263/1, RES-063-27-0061)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL 07901, T32HL007901)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-48832, R01MH048832)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
sleep spindles, memory consolidation, lexical integration, memory retrieval, polysomnography, mental lexicon, sleep-dependent memory
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Cues, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reading, Mental Recall, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Knowledge, Neocortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review