Cited by 246Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Neuroprotective effects of lixisenatide and liraglutide in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson’s disease

Open access
Liu, W., Jalewa, J., Sharma, M., Li, G., Li, L., Hölscher, C.·2015·Neuroscience

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a growth factor. GLP-1 mimetics are on the market as treatments for type 2 diabetes and are well tolerated. These drugs have shown neuroprotective properties in animal models of neurodegenerative disorders. In addition, the GLP-1 mimetic exendin-4 has shown protective effects in animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD), and a clinical trial in PD patients showed promising first results. Liraglutide and lixisenatide are two newer GLP-1 mimetics which have a longer biological half-life than exendin-4. We previously showed that these drugs have neuroprotective properties in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease. Here we demonstrate the neuroprotective effects in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse model of PD. MPTP was injected once-daily (20mg/kg i.p.) for 7 days, and drugs were injected once-daily for 14 days i.p. When comparing exendin-4 (10 nmol/kg), liraglutide (25 nmol/kg) and lixisenatide (10 nmol/kg), it was found that exendin-4 showed no protective effects at the dose chosen. Both liraglutide and lixisenatide showed effects in preventing the MPTP-induced motor impairment (Rotarod, open-field locomotion, catalepsy test), reduction in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) levels (dopamine synthesis) in the substantia nigra and basal ganglia, a reduction of the pro-apoptotic signaling molecule BAX and an increase in the anti-apoptotic signaling molecule B-cell lymphoma-2. The results demonstrate that in this study, both liraglutide and lixisenatide are superior to exendin-4, and both drugs show promise as a novel treatment of PD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.054

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier GLP-1RAs, such as liraglutide and lixisenatide, have been shown to protect dopaminergic neurons and reduce motor disability in animal models.

    “Regarding Parkinson disease, earlier GLP-1RAs, such as liraglutide and lixisenatide, have been shown to protect dopaminergic neurons and reduce motor disability in animal models.32”
  • GLP-1RAs exhibit noticeable increase in level of phosphorylated ERK1/2 within sciatic nerve of diabetic rats.

    “Researchers have discovered that GLP-1RAs exhibit a noticeable increase in the level of phosphorylated ERK1/2 within the sciatic nerve of diabetic rats.”

    From Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor: mechanisms and advances in therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [401]

    The Discussion mentions GLP-1 receptor signaling through MAPk2 and PKA, but does not report phosphorylated ERK1/2 levels in sciatic nerves. The reported experiments concern an MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease, not diabetic rats. Searches for phosphorylated ERK1/2 and sciatic nerve findings found no passage addressing the claimed result. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, W., Jalewa, J., Sharma, M., Li, G., Li, L., & Hölscher, C.
Affiliations
  • Shanxi Medical University (CN)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
303
Pages
42-50
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2211963426
Cited by
246
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cure Parkinson’s Trust, UK
  • Shanxi Province Government, China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, liraglutide, lixisenatide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, neuroprotection, MPTP mouse model, exendin-4, dopamine synthesis, substantia nigra, Bax, Bcl-2, apoptosis, motor impairment, catalepsy
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor, Liraglutide, Exenatide, Animals, Basal Ganglia, Catalepsy, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Peptides, Substantia Nigra, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Venoms, 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, Apoptosis, Neuroprotective Agents, Parkinsonian Disorders, Rotarod Performance Test, Mice, Dopaminergic Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review