Cited by 889Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Athauda, Dilan, Maclagan, Kate, Skene, Simon S, Bajwa-Joseph, Martha, Letchford, Dawn, Chowdhury, Kashfia, Hibbert, Steve, Budnik, Natalia +10 more·2017·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, has neuroprotective effects in preclinical models of Parkinson's disease. We investigated whether these effects would be apparent in a clinical trial.Methods In this single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients with moderate Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous injections of exenatide 2 mg or placebo once weekly for 48 weeks in addition to their regular medication, followed by a 12-week washout period. Eligible patients were aged 25-75 years, had idiopathic Parkinson's disease as measured by Queen Square Brain Bank criteria, were on dopaminergic treatment with wearing-off effects, and were at Hoehn and Yahr stage 2·5 or less when on treatment. Randomisation was by web-based randomisation with a two strata block design according to disease severity. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the adjusted difference in the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) motor subscale (part 3) in the practically defined off-medication state at 60 weeks. All efficacy analyses were based on a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who completed any post-randomisation follow-up assessments. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01971242) and is completed.Findings Between June 18, 2014, and March 13, 2015, 62 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 32 to exenatide and 30 to placebo. Our primary analysis included 31 patients in the exenatide group and 29 patients in the placebo group. At 60 weeks, off-medication scores on part 3 of the MDS-UPDRS had improved by 1·0 points (95% CI -2·6 to 0·7) in the exenatide group and worsened by 2·1 points (-0·6 to 4·8) in the placebo group, an adjusted mean difference of -3·5 points (-6·7 to -0·3; p=0·0318). Injection site reactions and gastrointestinal symptoms were common adverse events in both groups. Six serious adverse events occurred in the exenatide group and two in the placebo group, although none in either group were judged to be related to the study interventions.Interpretation Exenatide had positive effects on practically defined off-medication motor scores in Parkinson's disease, which were sustained beyond the period of exposure. Whether exenatide affects the underlying disease pathophysiology or simply induces long-lasting symptomatic effects is uncertain. Exenatide represents a major new avenue for investigation in Parkinson's disease, and effects on everyday symptoms should be examined in longer-term trials.Funding Michael J Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31585-4

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three clinical trials consistently describe a slowed decline in motor function when using the short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists exenatide and lixisenatide in people with Parkinson's disease.

    “Three clinical trials consistently describe a slowed decline in motor function when using the short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists exenatide and lixisenatide in people with Parkinson's disease; 102-104”

    From GLP-1 receptor agonists and next-generation incretin-based medications: metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal benefits (2026) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that off-medication motor scores worsened with placebo but improved with once-weekly exenatide at 60 weeks. The Discussion (page unavailable) cautions that a lasting symptomatic effect cannot be distinguished from an effect on disease progression. This trial does not establish the claim about three trials or clinical motor outcomes with lixisenatide, and it tested a once-weekly exenatide formulation rather than a short-acting regimen. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Treatment with exenatide or lixisenatide for 1 year produced a modest but positive effect on MDS-UPDRS part III scores in people with recently diagnosed Parkinson's disease.

    “Treatment with exenatide or lixisenatide for 1 year produced a modest but positive effect on Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III scores in people with recently diagnosed Parkinson’s disease (15, 53).”

    From Antiinflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide-1–based therapies beyond metabolic benefits (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Results and Discussion (pages not provided) report a modest improvement in off-medication MDS-UPDRS part III scores after 48 weeks of exenatide. This trial did not test lixisenatide, and it preferentially recruited patients with moderate disease rather than recently diagnosed or early-stage Parkinson’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The discrepancy between no significant Parkinson protection and prior animal model data may reflect differences in neuroprotective mechanisms of semaglutide and tirzepatide vs earlier GLP-1RAs.

    “This discrepancy may reflect differences in the neuroprotective mechanisms of semaglutide and tirzepatide vs earlier GLP-1RAs, such as exenatide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide, which have demonstrated favorable clinical benefits in early-stage Parkinson disease.33,50”

    From Neurodegeneration and Stroke After Semaglutide and Tirzepatide in Patients With Diabetes and Obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Results report a significant off-medication motor benefit for exenatide versus placebo at 60 weeks. But the Discussion says the trial recruited patients with moderate Parkinson’s disease preferentially over those with early-stage disease, so this source does not support the sentence’s early-stage qualifier. The proposed difference in mechanisms involving semaglutide and tirzepatide is the citing authors’ speculation, not a finding attributed to this trial. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Parkinson's disease, phase II trials have shown that exenatide and lixisenatide improve motor activity compared to placebo.

    “In Parkinson's disease, phase II trials have shown that GLP-1 RAs such as exenatide and lixisenatide improve motor activity compared to placebo,53,54 and liraglutide has shown improvements in non-motor symptoms, mobility, and quality of life.55”
  • There is increasing evidence from animal studies and clinical trials to suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists could be beneficial in the treatment of PD.

    “There is increasing evidence from animal studies and clinical trials to suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists could be beneficial in the treatment of PD, and one study using a prebiotic supplement that enhanced SCFA levels showed an increase GLP-1 levels in mouse models [141–144].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Athauda, D., Maclagan, K., Skene, S. S., Bajwa-Joseph, M., Letchford, D., Chowdhury, K., Hibbert, S., Budnik, N., Zampedri, L., Dickson, J., Li, Y., Aviles-Olmos, I., Warner, T. T., Limousin, P., Lees, A. J., Greig, N. H., Tebbs, S., & Foltynie, T.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
Corresponding author
Foltynie, Thomas
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
390
Issue
10103
Pages
1664-1675
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2744843428
Cited by
889
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 114 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 20
FWCI
51.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 AG999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, exenatide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, neuroprotection, motor symptoms, off-medication state, dopaminergic therapy, neurodegeneration, adverse events, injection site reactions, gastrointestinal symptoms, drug repurposing, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Adult, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Parkinson Disease, Peptides, Venoms, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review