Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental toxicology of hydrogen sulfide

Open access
Malone Rubright, Samantha L., Pearce, Linda L., Peterson, Jim·2017·Nitric Oxide

Abstract

The passenger-carrying paddle steamer Princess Alice was sunk in a collision on the River Thames in 1878 with the loss of over 640 lives and, curiously, may represent one of the largest mass poisoning episodes in history [1, 2]. Raw discharge from the London sewers had been released into the Thames (standard practice at the time) and some survivors reported the unusually foul nature of the water. The extraordinarily high death toll of the Princess Alice accident (> 80%) is in stark contrast to the similarly violent sinking of the pleasure craft Marchioness on the Thames a century later in 1989, where only 51 of 130 people on board were lost (< 40% fatalities) [3, 4]. The Board of Trade inquiry and the Coroner’s inquest at the time of the Princess Alice disaster were primarily concerned with establishing blame for the collision and determining if there were any criminal charges to be filed. That there may have been significant deaths caused by hydrogen sulfide (H2S) inhalation, possibly accelerated by the victims thrashing at the surface, was not given much serious consideration [1, 2]. Nevertheless, it was only nine years after the Princess Alice disaster occurred that the necessary investment was made to treat and separate the sewage before releasing it into the Thames [5]. It has since become entrenched in sanitary engineering lore that many of the Princess Alice deaths were due to poisoning, probably by H2S [6]. While it is now widely accepted that H2S acts as a signaling molecule and exhibits some potentially beneficial therapeutic effects [7–15] at elevated levels H2S is highly toxic. Gaseous H2S continues to be one of the most common hazardous substances attributed to acute poisoning deaths in occupational settings [16]. However, there are still facets of H2S toxicity that remain elusive – including, but not necessarily limited to, a comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of this poisonous gas emitted into the environment and any effects associated with such exposures, the mechanism(s) of its cellular toxicity, and lack of effective antidotes. Herein, we consider some of the knowledge gaps associated with H2S in the environment and its toxic effects on the human body when inhaled.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.niox.2017.09.011

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Malone Rubright, S. L., Pearce, L. L., & Peterson, J.
Venue
Nitric Oxide
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
71
Pages
1-13
ISSN
1089-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762942463
Cited by
347
References
3
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.niox.2017.09.011
The paper
Malone Rubright, S. L., Pearce, L. L., & Peterson, J. (2017). Environmental toxicology of hydrogen sulfide. Nitric Oxide. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2017.09.011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.