CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Agricultural Innovations and PracticesAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What is technography?

Open access
Jansen, K., Vellema, S.·2011·NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Technography has recently been proposed as an interdisciplinary methodology for the detailed study of the use of skills, tools, knowledge and techniques in everyday life. This paper argues that technography is a useful methodological approach for the integrative study of social–technical configurations. Technography focuses on how teams or networks of farmers, technicians and engineers, amongst other actors, solve problems. The key characteristics of the technographic approach are discussed, using examples drawn from agricultural production. The concept of performance helps to distinguish technography from some common agronomic as well as social science approaches to technological change. We conclude that technography, which is basically a methodology, needs to be complemented with a social analysis of concrete political, economic and cultural processes that co-evolve with technological change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.003

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Richards P., 2004, Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation, 261
  2. Vellema S., 2004, Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation, 42
  3. Jansen K., 2004, Agribusiness and Society: Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation, 145
  4. Gupta A., 2004, Earthly Politics, Worldly Knowledge: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, 127
  5. Schlanger N., 2006, Marcel Mauss. Techniques, Technology and Civilisation, 1
  6. van den Belt H., 2009, Handbook Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, 1149

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Jansen, K., & Vellema, S.
Affiliations
Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Jansen, K.
ORCID
Venue
NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
57
Issue
3-4
Pages
169-177
ISSN
  • 1573-5214 (ISSN-L)
  • 2212-1307
DOI
10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.003
OpenAlex
W2035032503
Cited by
122
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
17.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technography, technological change, agricultural production, problem solving, performance, interdisciplinary methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review