Cited by 20Memory and Neural MechanismsAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Spontaneously hypertensive, Wistar Kyoto and Sprague-Dawley rats differ in their use of place and response strategies in the water radial arm maze.

Clements, K.M., Saunders, A.J., Robertson, B.-A., Wainwright, P.E.·2007·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

This study further characterises the use of mnemonic systems in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR), which is frequently used as a rodent model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The objective of this study was to assess the preference of male SHR, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats for a place or response strategy when trained on an ambiguous T-maze task, and also to examine whether all strains acquired information about both strategies during ambiguous training, regardless of their preferred strategy. In the first experiment, SHR and WKY showed a preference for a response strategy on the ambiguous T-maze task; in contrast, SD displayed a preference for a place strategy. In the second experiment, all strains demonstrated that they learned information about both the response and place strategies during ambiguous training. However, on a conditioned place preference test SHR did not display as strong a preference for the place arm as WKY and SD. This finding supports previous research in a conditioned cue preference test, in which SHR did not display a preference for the cue associated with the platform. These observations that the strains differ with respect to behavioural strategy in a learning task suggest that they differ in the underlying neural circuitry that serves goal-directed behaviour, and are consistent with SHR having deficits associated with the nucleus accumbens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2006.09.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maze performance of SHR rats suggests they preferentially use response strategies to guide behavior in spatial tasks.

    “Maze performance of SHR rats suggests they preferentially use response strategies to guide behavior in spatial tasks (Clements and Wainwright, 2006; Clements et al., 2007; Kantak et al., 2008).”

    From The Effects of Methylphenidate on Goal-directed Behavior in a Rat Model of ADHD (2015) · cites this paper as Clements et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clements, K. M., Saunders, A. J., Robertson, B.-A., & Wainwright, P. E.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Clements, K.M.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
285-294
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964101094
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
spontaneously hypertensive rats, Wistar-Kyoto rats, Sprague-Dawley rats, place strategy, response strategies, T-maze, conditioned place preference, nucleus accumbens, goal-directed behavior, rat strain differences, spatial learning
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Hypertension, Male, Rats, Inbred SHR, Rats, Inbred WKY, Space Perception, Species Specificity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review