Cited by 32Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Total sleep deprivation impairs the encoding of trace-conditioned memory in the rat

Chowdhury, Ananya, Chandra, Ruchi, Jha, Sushil K.·2011·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Sleep may help consolidate the information of certain memories, though its benefits in the consolidation of trace-conditioned memory still remain elusive. We investigated the effect of sleep deprivation on trace learning in male wistar rats. Rats were trained for trace conditioning and the number of head entries into liquid dispenser was accounted as an outcome measure of trace-learning. For training and testing, 75 presentations of conditioned stimulus (CS) (light) and unconditioned stimulus (US) (juice) were offered in five sessions (15 presentations/session; with 5 min inter-session gap). The duration of CS and US stimuli were 15 and 20s respectively, with 5s trace delay between stimuli and 20s condition delay between each presentation. The animals were divided randomly into three groups soon after training, sleep deprived (SD) (n=8), non-SD (NSD) (n=8) and stress control (n=5) groups. The animals of NSD and control groups were left undisturbed, while SD animals were sleep deprived for 6h after training. The learning of trace-conditioned task was examined on following days. We observed that SD rats poked approximately 63% less than NSD and control groups (p<0.001) to obtain juice on testing day. Also, the NSD rats exhibited significant positive correlation in number of head entries during the training and testing days; while the SD rats showed no significant correlation. The results demonstrate that SD animals had difficulties to associate CS with US and suggest that sleep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.01.009

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is convergent evidence in humans and rats for an impairment of learning when they were deprived of sleep.

    “Indeed, there is convergent evidence for such action in humans and rats, i.e., an impairment of learning when they were deprived of sleep (195,328,500,634,759,1291,1345).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [195]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chowdhury, A., Chandra, R., & Jha, S. K.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Corresponding author
Jha, Sushil K.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
95
Issue
3
Pages
355-360
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039475777
Cited by
32
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
sleep deprivation, trace conditioning, memory encoding, memory consolidation, associative learning, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned stimulus, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Male, Memory, Random Allocation, Sleep Deprivation, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review