Cited by 41Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The Class IIa histone deacetylase HDAC4 and neuronal function: Nuclear nuisance and cytoplasmic stalwart?

Fitzsimons, Helen L.·2015·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) family members are important mediators of epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of memory formation. Recent studies have revealed that Class IIa HDAC family member HDAC4 contributes essential functions to synaptic plasticity and memory as well as other neurological processes. HDAC4 is localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm and undergoes subcellular shuttling in response to synaptic activity. In the nucleus, HDAC4 is a repressor of transcriptional programmes, although vertebrate HDAC4 is itself catalytically inactive and repression is facilitated through direct inhibition of transcription factors such as MEF2. In the brain, however, HDAC4 is predominantly cytoplasmic, and a pool of HDAC4 is concentrated in dendritic spines. This review explores and synthesizes the evidence that specific subcellular pools of HDAC4 mediate differential effects on neurological function. Nuclear-restriction of HDAC4 results in down-regulation of plasticity-related genes and memory impairment. However loss of HDAC4 also results in memory deficits through unknown mechanisms. The localization to dendritic shafts and spines, combined with the evidence that cytoplasmic HDAC4 is neuroprotective in some models of neurological dysfunction point to an essential cytoplasmic role. Investigation of extra-nuclear roles of HDAC4, including identification of cytoplasmic binding partners is paramount in order to understand and therefore manipulate its function for potential therapeutic benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2015.06.006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fitzsimons, H. L.
Affiliations
Massey University (NZ)
Corresponding author
Fitzsimons, Helen L.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
123
Pages
149-158
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W565347010
Cited by
41
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 9
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Massey University
  • Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
HDAC4, class IIa histone deacetylases, nuclear localization, dendritic spines, synaptic plasticity, memory formation, MEF2, transcriptional repression, neuroprotection, epigenetic regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cytoplasm, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Memory, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Repressor Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review