Cited by 17Memory and Neural MechanismsOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesMemory Processes and Influences

Neural correlates of olfactory and visual memory performance in 3D-simulated mazes after intranasal insulin application

Brünner, Yvonne F., Rodriguez-Raecke, Rea, Mutic, Smiljana, Benedict, Christian, Freiherr, Jessica·2016·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

This fMRI study intended to establish 3D-simulated mazes with olfactory and visual cues and examine the effect of intranasally applied insulin on memory performance in healthy subjects. The effect of insulin on hippocampus-dependent brain activation was explored using a double-blind and placebo-controlled design. Following intranasal administration of either insulin (40IU) or placebo, 16 male subjects participated in two experimental MRI sessions with olfactory and visual mazes. Each maze included two separate runs. The first was an encoding maze during which subjects learned eight olfactory or eight visual cues at different target locations. The second was a recall maze during which subjects were asked to remember the target cues at spatial locations. For eleven included subjects in the fMRI analysis we were able to validate brain activation for odor perception and visuospatial tasks. However, we did not observe an enhancement of declarative memory performance in our behavioral data or hippocampal activity in response to insulin application in the fMRI analysis. It is therefore possible that intranasal insulin application is sensitive to the methodological variations e.g. timing of task execution and dose of application. Findings from this study suggest that our method of 3D-simulated mazes is feasible for studying neural correlates of olfactory and visual memory performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.027

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The same 40 IU IN insulin dose did not improve performance in 3D-simulated mazes and associated fMRI-assessed hippocampal activation.

    “the same dose did not improve performance in 3D-simulated mazes and associated fMRI-assessed hippocampal activation, which was attributed to the potential influence of subtle differences in timing.108”

    From Intranasal insulin (2021) · cites this paper as [108]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brünner, Y. F., Rodriguez-Raecke, R., Mutic, S., Benedict, C., & Freiherr, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Brünner, Yvonne F.
  • Freiherr, Jessica
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
134
Pages
256-263
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2485863440
Cited by
17
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Faculty of Uniklinik RWTH Aachen (691140)
  • German Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
intranasal insulin, olfactory memory, visual memory, spatial memory, hippocampus, olfaction, visuospatial memory, neural correlates of memory
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Visual Perception, Maze Learning, Olfactory Perception, Young Adult, Functional Neuroimaging, Spatial Memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review