Cited by 18Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSpatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Impairment in active navigation from trauma and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

Open access
Miller, Jessica K., McDougall, Siné, Thomas, Sarah, Wiener, Jan M.·2017·Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Abstract

The study investigated the impact of trauma exposure and of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) on spatial processing and active navigation in a sample (n=138) comprising civilians (n=91), police officers (n=22) and veterans (n=27). Individuals with previous trauma exposure exhibited significantly poorer hippocampal-dependent (allocentric) navigation performance on active navigation in a virtual environment (the Alternative Route task) regardless of whether or not they had PTSD (scoring above 20 on the PTSD Diagnostic Scale). No effect of trauma exposure was found in static perspective taking (the Four Mountains task). Moreover, an associative information processing bias in those with PTSD interfered with ability to use hippocampal-dependent processing in active navigation. This study provides new evidence of impaired active navigation in individuals with trauma exposure and highlights the importance of considering the relationship between trauma and spatial processing in clinical and occupational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.02.019

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to previous trauma is associated with a greater impairment in specific aspects of spatial processing.

    “In this study and in a separate study of navigation [37], exposure to previous trauma was associated with a greater impairment in specific aspects of spatial processing.”

    From Memory and Forgetting (2018) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. K., McDougall, S., Thomas, S., & Wiener, J. M.
Affiliations
Bournemouth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Miller, Jessica K.
Venue
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
140
Pages
114-123
ISSN
1074-7427 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2592215825
Cited by
18
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Army of Angels
  • Combat Stress
  • Dorset Constabulary and Dorset University Healthcare Foundation Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma exposure, active navigation, allocentric navigation, egocentric navigation, spatial processing, hippocampal-dependent memory, virtual navigation, police officers, veterans, perspective taking
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review