Cited by 67Muscle Physiology and DisordersNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Randomized phase 2 trial and open-label extension of domagrozumab in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Open access
Wagner, Kathryn R., Abdel-Hamid, Hoda Z., Mah, Jean K., Campbell, Craig, Guglieri, Michela, Muntoni, Francesco, Takeshima, Yasuhiro, McDonald, Craig M. +16 more·2020·Neuromuscular Disorders

Abstract

We report results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, 2-period trial (48 weeks each) of domagrozumab and its open-label extension in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Of 120 ambulatory boys (aged 6 to <16 years) with DMD, 80 were treated with multiple ascending doses (5, 20, and 40 mg/kg) of domagrozumab and 40 treated with placebo. The primary endpoints were safety and mean change in 4-stair climb (4SC) time at week 49. Secondary endpoints included other functional tests, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Mean (SD) age was 8.4 (1.7) and 9.3 (2.3) years in domagrozumab- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Difference in mean (95% CI) change from baseline in 4SC at week 49 for domagrozumab vs placebo was 0.27 (-7.4 to 7.9) seconds (p = 0.94). There were no significant between-group differences in any secondary clinical endpoints. Most patients had ≥1 adverse event in the first 48 weeks; most were mild and not treatment-related. Median serum concentrations of domagrozumab increased with administered dose within each dose level. Non-significant increases in muscle volume were observed in domagrozumab- vs placebo-treated patients. Domagrozumab was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with DMD. Efficacy measures did not support a significant treatment effect. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02310763 and NCT02907619.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nmd.2020.05.002

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other inhibitors of the myostatin/activin pathway have shown increases in lean mass across different populations, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

    “Other inhibitors of the myostatin/activin pathway (e.g. trevogrumab, domagrozumab, landogrozumab) have shown increases in lean mass across different populations, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, but strength and function results are inconsistent [68].”

    From Muscle loss and GLP-1R agonists use (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

  • For other myostatin/activin pathway inhibitors, strength and function results are inconsistent.

    “Other inhibitors of the myostatin/activin pathway (e.g. trevogrumab, domagrozumab, landogrozumab) have shown increases in lean mass across different populations, including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, but strength and function results are inconsistent [68].”

    From Muscle loss and GLP-1R agonists use (2025) · cites this paper as [68]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, K. R., Abdel-Hamid, H. Z., Mah, J. K., Campbell, C., Guglieri, M., Muntoni, F., Takeshima, Y., McDonald, C. M., Kostera-Pruszczyk, A., Karachunski, P., Butterfield, R. J., Mercuri, E., Fiorillo, C., Bertini, E. S., Tian, C., Statland, J., Sadosky, A. B., Purohit, V. S., Sherlock, S. P., Palmer, J. P., Binks, M., Charnas, L., Marraffino, S., & Wong, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Hyogo Medical University (JP)
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Istituto Giannina Gaslini (IT)
  • Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Kathryn R.
Venue
Neuromuscular Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
492-502
ISSN
0960-8966 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028584612
Cited by
67
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-02-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Neuromuscular Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Duchenne muscular dystrophy, anti-CD14 antibody, functional outcome, drug safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, muscle volume, open-label extension
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Treatment Failure, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Myostatin, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review