Cited by 37Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesEstrogen and related hormone effects

Developmental treatment with bisphenol A causes few alterations on measures of postweaning activity and learning

Ferguson, Sherry A., Law, C. Delbert, Abshire, Jordan S.·2012·Neurotoxicology and Teratology

Abstract

Widespread bisphenol A (BPA) exposure necessitates increased knowledge of its potential effects for better risk assessment and regulatory guidance. Here, female Sprague-Dawley rats, reared in low exogenous estrogen environments and bred at adulthood, were gavaged on gestational days 6-21 with vehicle (VEH), 2.5 or 25.0 μg/kg/day BPA, or 5.0 or 10.0 μg/kg/day ethinyl estradiol (EE₂). Offspring were orally treated on postnatal days (PNDs) 1-21 with the same dose their dam received. A naïve control group (NC) was not gavaged. Post-weaning, one offspring/sex/litter (n=11-12/sex/group) was assessed for the typical behaviors measured in developmental neurotoxicology studies. At PND 29, novelty preference was unaffected by treatment; however, relative to the VEH group, males and females of both EE₂ groups were more active. VEH males appeared somewhat hypoactive in open field assessments at PNDs 40-42 and, as a result, males of the BPA and EE₂ groups were significantly more active. Latency to locate the Barnes maze escape box at PNDs 47-50 was increased in males and females of the 5.0 μg/kg/day EE₂ group. Relative to other male groups, VEH males exhibited an increased startle response on the first trial block at PND 54 and thus, males of both BPA groups and the 10.0 μg/kg/day EE₂ group exhibited a significantly decreased startle response. PNDs 43-44 motor coordination and PNDs 75-79 water maze performance were unaffected by treatment. These results indicate few consistent or dose-rel…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ntt.2012.09.006

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferguson, S. A., Law, C. D., & Abshire, J. S.
Affiliations
National Center for Toxicological Research (US)
Corresponding author
Ferguson, Sherry A.
Venue
Neurotoxicology and Teratology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-11
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
598-606
ISSN
0892-0362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066407978
Cited by
37
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurotoxicology and Teratology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
bisphenol A, developmental neurotoxicity, prenatal exposure, postnatal exposure, ethinyl estradiol, novelty preference, locomotor activity, startle response, learning, Barnes maze, water maze, sexual dimorphism, Sprague-Dawley rats
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Benzhydryl Compounds, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Male, Motor Activity, Phenols, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Reflex, Startle, Weaning, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review