The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perfect fluidity of the quark–gluon plasma core as seen through its dissipative hadronic corona
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The agreement of hydrodynamic predictions of differential elliptic flow and radial flow patterns with Au + Au data at s N N = 200 GeV is one of the main lines of evidence suggesting the nearly perfect fluid properties of the strongly coupled quark–gluon plasma, sQGP, produced at RHIC. We study the sensitivity of this conclusion to different hydrodynamic assumptions on hadro-chemical and thermal freezeout after the sQGP hadronizes. We show that if chemical freezeout occurs at the hadronization time, as required to reproduce the observed hadron yields, then, surprisingly, the differential elliptic flow, v 2 ( p T ) , for pions continues to increase with proper time in the late hadronic phase until thermal freezeout and leads to a discrepancy with the v 2 ( p T ) data. In contrast, if both hadro-chemical and thermal equilibrium are maintained past the hadronization point, then the mean transverse momentum per pion increases in a way that accidentally preserves v 2 ( p T ) from the sQGP phase in agreement with the data, but at the cost of the agreement with the observed hadronic yields. In order that all the data on (1) hadronic ratios, (2) radial flow, as well as (3) differential elliptic flow be reproduced, the sQGP core must expand with a minimal viscosity, η ≈ T c 3 , that is however even greater than the viscosity, η H ≈ T / σ H , of its hadronic corona. However, because of the large entropy density difference of the two phases of QCD matter, the larger viscosity in the sQGP phase leads to nearly perfect fluid flow in that phase while the smaller entropy density of the hadronic corona strongly hinders the applicability of Euler hydrodynamics in that phase. The “perfect fluid” property of the sQGP is thus not due to a sudden reduction of the viscosity at the critical temperature T c , but to a sudden increase of the entropy density of QCD matter and is therefore an important signature of deconfinement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly relativistic nucleus-nucleus collisions: The central rapidity region
Bjorken, J. D. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.140 · Cited by 2,796
Dynamics of hot bulk QCD matter: From the quark-gluon plasma to hadronic freeze-out
Bass, S. A., & Dumitru, A. (2000) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.064909 · Cited by 275
Signatures of quark-gluon plasma formation in high energy heavy-ion collisions: a critical review
Bass, S. A., Gyulassy, M., Stöcker, H., & Greiner, W. (1999) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/25/3/013 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Cited by
Romatschke, P., & Romatschke, U. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.172301 · Cited by 1,082
Conformal relativistic viscous hydrodynamics: Applications to RHIC results atsNN=200GeV
Luzum, M., & Romatschke, P. (2008) · Physical Review C · doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.034915 · Cited by 817
Energy Loss and Flow of Heavy Quarks inAu+AuCollisions atsNN=200 GeV
Adare, A., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N. N., Akiba, Y., Al-Bataineh, H., Alexander, J., Al-Jamel, A., Aoki, K., Aphecetche, L., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.172301 · Cited by 585
Equation of state and QCD transition at finite temperature
Bazavov, A., Bhattacharya, T., Cheng, M., Christ, N. H., DeTar, C., Ejiri, S., Gottlieb, S., Gupta, R., Heller, U. M., Huebner, K., et al. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.014504 · Cited by 571
Parton–hadron–string dynamics: An off-shell transport approach for relativistic energies
Cassing, W., & Bratkovskaya, E. L. (2009) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.09.007 · Cited by 381
Scaling Properties of Azimuthal Anisotropy inAu+AuandCu+CuCollisions atsNN=200 GeV
Adare, A., Afanasiev, S., Aidala, C., Ajitanand, N. N., Akiba, Y., Al-Bataineh, H., Alexander, J., Al-Jamel, A., Aoki, K., Aphecetche, L., et al. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.162301 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirano, T., & Gyulassy, M.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics A
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 769
- Pages
- 71-94
- ISSN
- 0375-9474 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964727676
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.