The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dark Matter interpretations of the e± excesses after FERMI
Open accessAbstract
The cosmic-ray excess observed by PAMELA in the positron fraction and by FERMI and HESS in the electron + positron flux can be interpreted in terms of DM annihilations or decays into leptonic final states. Final states into tau's or 4mu give the best fit to the excess. However, in the annihilation scenario, they are incompatible with photon and neutrino constraints, unless DM has a quasi-constant density profile. Final states involving electrons are less constrained but poorly fit the excess, unless hidden sector radiation makes their energy spectrum smoother, allowing a fit to all the data with a combination of leptonic modes. In general, DM lighter than about a TeV cannot fit the excesses, so PAMELA should find a greater positron fraction at higher energies. The DM interpretation can be tested by FERMI gamma observations above 10 GeV: if the electronic excess is everywhere in the DM halo, inverse Compton scattering on ambient light produces a well-predicted gamma excess that FERMI should soon detect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Cited by
PPPC 4 DM ID: a poor particle physicist cookbook for dark matter indirect detection
Cirelli, M., Corcella, G., Hektor, A., Hütsi, G., Kadastik, M., Panci, P., Raidal, M., Sala, F., & Strumia, A. (2011) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/03/051 · Cited by 783
Self-citationDark matter self-interactions and light force carriers
Buckley, M. R., & Fox, P. J. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.083522 · Cited by 287
THE FERMI HAZE: A GAMMA-RAY COUNTERPART TO THE MICROWAVE HAZE
Dobler, G., Finkbeiner, D. P., Cholis, I., Slatyer, T., & Weiner, N. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/2/825 · Cited by 285
Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter
Feng, J. L., Kaplinghat, M., & Yu, H.-B. (2010) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.083525 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Meade, P., Papucci, M., Strumia, A., & Volansky, T.
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 831
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 178-203
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1778759345
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark Matter interpretations of the e± excesses after FERMI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.01.012
- The paper
- Meade, P., Papucci, M., Strumia, A., & Volansky, T. (2010). Dark Matter interpretations of the e± excesses after FERMI. Nuclear Physics B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.01.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.