Cited by 76Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDialysis and Renal Disease Management

Effects of acute-phase response on nutritional status and clinical outcome of hospitalized patients

Gariballa, Salah, Forster, Sarah·2006·Nutrition

Abstract

Objective We measured the effects of acute-phase response on nutritional status and clinical outcome in hospitalized older patients. Methods Four hundred forty-five patients who took part in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nutritional supplementation had their nutritional status assessed from anthropometric, hematologic, and biochemical data at baseline, 6 wk, and 6 mo. Outcome measures including disability, length of stay, and 1-y mortality were recorded. C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, a marker of acute-phase response, was also measured. Multivariate analysis was used to measure the association between acute-phase response and nutritional assessment variables after adjusting for age, disability, chronic illness, medications, and smoking. Results Energy intake in the hospital was significantly lower among patients with higher CRP concentrations. Serum albumin, transferrin, plasma ascorbic acid, and hemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower and serum ferritin higher in patients with acute-phase response (CRP > 10 mg/L) than in patients without acute-phase response (CRP Conclusion Acute-phase response is associated with poor nutritional status and poor clinical outcome in older patients. Whether nutritional support removes or mitigates the hazard of poor outcome associated with acute-phase response needs to be determined.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nut.2006.04.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a double-blind randomized trial of 445 polymorbid patients, the acute-phase response was strongly associated with poor nutritional status and worse clinical outcomes, particularly in older patients.

    “A doubleblind randomized trial of nutritional supplementation published [166] by Gariballa et al., in 2006, including 445 polymorbid patients, concluded that the acute-phase response was strongly associated with poor nutritional status and worse clinical outcomes, particularly in older patients (Level of evidence: 1þþ).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gariballa, S., & Forster, S.
Affiliations
  • United Arab Emirates University (AE)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Gariballa, Salah
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
22
Issue
7-8
Pages
750-757
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011858686
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Keywords
acute phase response, C-reactive protein, nutritional status, hospitalized older adults, dietary supplementation, nutritional support, serum albumin, transferrin, serum ferritin, plasma ascorbic acid, hemoglobin, energy intake, length of hospital stay, mortality, disability
MeSH terms
Acute-Phase Reaction, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Ascorbic Acid, C-Reactive Protein, Energy Intake, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hemoglobins, Hospitalization, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Nutritional Status, Placebos, Prognosis, Serum Albumin, Transferrin, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review