Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey

Open access
Tang, Ming, Liao, Huchang·2021·Omega

Abstract

The arrival of Big Data era has brought large, complex, and growing data generated from numerous sources. Due to the power in felicitous decision making based on diverse and large data, Big Data can be used in distinct disciplines, especially in social Big Data such as e-commerce, e-marketplaces and social media platforms. As a result, the large-scale group decision making, in which a large number of decision-makers take part in the decision-making process, has become a much-talked-about topic in decision science. Because of the characteristics of social Big Data, much more information in large-scale group decision making will arise than conventional group decision making. Information is a key factor that influences the performance of decision-makers. Therefore, how to manage the challenges from conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making is a critical and interesting research topic. Up to now, many studies have been published to tackle these challenges. The objective of this study is to summarize the challenges and present a state-of-the-art survey of main achievements in this field. We also provide existing research gaps and future directions that require further consideration. It is hoped that our study could give insights for scholars and practitioners along the developments and promising research of large-scale group decision making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Tang, M., & Liao, H.
Venue
Omega
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
100
Pages
102141
ISSN
0305-0483 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980084615
Cited by
287
References
102
FWCI
20.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141
The paper
Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.