The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade
Open accessAbstract
Following the landmark 2015 United Nations Paris Agreement, a growing number of countries are committing to the transition to net-zero emissions. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been consistently heralded to directly address emissions from the energy and industrial sectors and forms a significant component of plans to reach net-zero. However, despite the critical importance of the technology and substantial research and development to date, CCS deployment has been slow. This review examines deployment efforts over the last decade. We reveal that facility deployment must increase dramatically from current levels, and much work remains to maximize storage of CO 2 in vast subsurface reserves. Using current rates of deployment, CO 2 storage capacity by 2050 is projected to be around 700 million tons per year, just 10% of what is required. Meeting the net-zero targets via CCS ambitions seems unlikely unless worldwide coordinated efforts and rapid changes in policy take place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.
Schiavon, S., & Zecchin, R. (2007) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 16,994
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Self-citationNet Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector
Bouckaert, S., Pales, A. F., McGlade, C., Remme, U., Wanner, B., Varro, L., D’Ambrosio, D., & Spencer, T. (2021) · Cited by 1,732
An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential
Budinis, S., Krevor, S., Dowell, N. M., Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2018) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.08.003 · Cited by 583
Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation
Alcalde, J., Flude, S., Wilkinson, M., Johnson, G., Edlmann, K., Bond, C. E., Scott, V., Gilfillan, S. M. V., Ogaya, X., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04423-1 · Cited by 442
Self-citationChina's carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: A critical review
Jiang, K., Ashworth, P., Zhang, S., Liang, X., Sun, Y., & Angus, D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109601 · Cited by 422
Last chance for carbon capture and storage
Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H., & Haszeldine, R. S. (2013) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate1695 · Cited by 376
Self-citationHaszeldine, R. S., Flude, S., Johnson, G., & Scott, V. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0447 · Cited by 348
Self-citationTechno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization
Zimmermann, A. W., Wunderlich, J., Müller, L., Buchner, G. A., Marxen, A., Michailos, S., Armstrong, K., Naims, H., McCord, S., Styring, P., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Hong, W. Y. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044 · Cited by 455
Future environmental impacts of global hydrogen production
Wei, S., Sacchi, R., Tukker, A., Suh, S., & Steubing, B. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee03875k · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin-Roberts, E., Scott, V., Flude, S., Johnson, G., Haszeldine, R. S., & Gilfillan, S.
- Venue
- One Earth
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1569-1584
- ISSN
- 2590-3322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3209224011
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 13.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.002
- The paper
- Martin-Roberts, E., Scott, V., Flude, S., Johnson, G., Haszeldine, R. S., & Gilfillan, S. (2021). Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade. One Earth. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
