The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization
Open accessAbstract
Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) is an emerging technology field that can replace fossil carbon value chains, and that has a significant potential to achieve emissions mitigation or even ‘negative emissions’ – however in many cases with challenging technology feasibility and economic viability. Further challenges arise in the decision making for CCU technology research, development, and deployment, in particular when allocating funding or time resources. No generally accepted techno-economic assessment (TEA) standard has evolved, and assessment studies often result in “apples vs. oranges” comparisons, a lack of transparency and a lack of comparability to other studies. A detailed guideline for systematic techno-economic (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) for CCU technologies was developed; this paper shows a summarized version of the TEA guideline, which includes distinct and prioritized (shall and should) rules and which allows conducting TEA in parallel to LCA. The TEA guideline was developed in a co-operative and creative approach with roughly 50 international experts and is based on a systematic literature review as well as on existing best practices from TEA and LCA from the areas of industry, academia, and policy. To the best of our knowledge, this guideline is the first TEA framework with a focus on CCU technologies and the first that is designed to be conducted in parallel to LCA due to aligned vocabulary and assessment steps, systematically including technology maturity. Therefore, this work extends current literature, improving the design, implementation, and reporting approaches of TEA studies for CCU technologies. Overall, the application of this TEA guideline aims at improved comparability of TEA studies, leading to improved decision making and more efficient allocation of funds and time resources for the research, development, and deployment of CCU technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Should We Make with CO2 and How Can We Make It?
Bushuyev, O. S., De Luna, P., Dinh, C. T., Tao, L., Saur, G., van de Lagemaat, J., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,593
Techno-Economic Analysis of Autotrophic Microalgae for Fuel Production
Davis, R., Aden, A., & Pienkos, P. T. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.018 · Cited by 1,069
Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice
Swarr, T. E., Hunkeler, D., Klöpffer, W., Pesonen, H.-L., Ciroth, A., Brent, A. C., & Pagan, R. (2011) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0287-5 · Cited by 656
Climate change mitigation potential of carbon capture and utilization in the chemical industry
Kätelhön, A., Meys, R., Deutz, S., Suh, S., & Bardow, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821029116 · Cited by 643
Closing the loop: captured CO 2 as a feedstock in the chemical industry
Otto, A., Grube, T., Schiebahn, S., & Stolten, D. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02591e · Cited by 482
Pérez-Fortes, M., Schöneberger, J. C., Boulamanti, A., Harrison, G., & Tzimas, E. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.199 · Cited by 301 · cited 1×
“, 2017) 9 (Versteeg and Rubin, 2011) 24 (Cormos, 2014) 39 (Reiter and Lindorfer, 2015) 54 (Pérez-Fortes et al., 2016a) 69 (Zhang et al.”
Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis
Dimitriou, I., García-Gutiérrez, P., Elder, R. H., Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., Azapagic, A., & Allen, R. W. K. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee04117h · Cited by 301
Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects
de Coninck, H., & Benson, S. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-032112-095222 · Cited by 268
Economics of carbon dioxide capture and utilization—a supply and demand perspective
Naims, H. (2016) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-016-6810-2 · Cited by 221
Self-citationThomassen, G., Van Dael, M., Van Passel, S., & You, F. (2019) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc02223f · Cited by 197
Cited by
Lyu, H., Chen, O. I.-F., Hanikel, N., Hossain, M. I., Flaig, R. W., Pei, X., Amin, A., Doherty, M. D., Impastato, R. K., Glover, T. G., et al. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c13368 · Cited by 369
Mahmud, R., Moni, S. M., High, K., & Carbajales-Dale, M. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128247 · Cited by 369
Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade
Martin-Roberts, E., Scott, V., Flude, S., Johnson, G., Haszeldine, R. S., & Gilfillan, S. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.002 · Cited by 312
Mineralization Technology for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage
Hills, C. D., Tripathi, N., & Carey, P. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00142 · Cited by 180
Review of electrofuel feasibility—cost and environmental impact
Grahn, M., Malmgren, E., Korberg, A. D., Taljegard, M., Anderson, J. E., Brynolf, S., Hansson, J., Skov, I. R., & Wallington, T. J. (2022) · Progress in Energy · doi:10.1088/2516-1083/ac7937 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Zimmermann, A. W., Wunderlich, J., Müller, L., Buchner, G. A., Marxen, A., Michailos, S., Armstrong, K., Naims, H., McCord, S., Styring, P., Sick, V., & Schomäcker, R.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Energy Research
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-01-31
- Volume
- 8
- ISSN
- 2296-598X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3003641122
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 15.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005
- The paper
- Zimmermann, A. W., Wunderlich, J., Müller, L., Buchner, G. A., Marxen, A., Michailos, S., Armstrong, K., Naims, H., McCord, S., Styring, P., Sick, V., & Schomäcker, R. (2020). Techno-Economic Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization. Frontiers in Energy Research. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
