Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 597

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fully Automated Detection and Quantification of Macular Fluid in OCT Using Deep Learning

Open access
Schlegl, Thomas, Waldstein, Sebastian M., Bogunovic, Hrvoje, Endstraßer, Franz, Sadeghipour, Amir, Philip, Ana-Maria, Podkowinski, Dominika, Gerendas, Bianca S., Langs, Georg, Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula·2018·Ophthalmology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Development and validation of a fully automated method to detect and quantify macular fluid in conventional OCT images. DESIGN: Development of a diagnostic modality. PARTICIPANTS: The clinical dataset for fluid detection consisted of 1200 OCT volumes of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n = 400), diabetic macular edema (DME, n = 400), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO, n = 400) acquired with Zeiss Cirrus (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) (n = 600) or Heidelberg Spectralis (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) (n = 600) OCT devices. METHODS: A method based on deep learning to automatically detect and quantify intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC) and subretinal fluid (SRF) was developed. The performance of the algorithm in accurately identifying fluid localization and extent was evaluated against a manual consensus reading of 2 masked reading center graders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance of a fully automated method to accurately detect, differentiate, and quantify intraretinal and SRF using area under the receiver operating characteristics curves, precision, and recall. RESULTS: The newly designed, fully automated diagnostic method based on deep learning achieved optimal accuracy for the detection and quantification of IRC for all 3 macular pathologies with a mean accuracy (AUC) of 0.94 (range, 0.91-0.97), a mean precision of 0.91, and a mean recall of 0.84. The detection and measurement of SRF were also highly accurate with an AUC of 0.92 (range, 0.86-0.98), a mean precision of 0.61, and a mean recall of 0.81, with superior performance in neovascular AMD and RVO compared with DME, which was represented rarely in the population studied. High linear correlation was confirmed between automated and manual fluid localization and quantification, yielding an average Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.90 for IRC and of 0.96 for SRF. CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning in retinal image analysis achieves excellent accuracy for the differential detection of retinal fluid types across the most prevalent exudative macular diseases and OCT devices. Furthermore, quantification of fluid achieves a high level of concordance with manual expert assessment. Fully automated analysis of retinal OCT images from clinical routine provides a promising horizon in improving accuracy and reliability of retinal diagnosis for research and clinical practice in ophthalmology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.031

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 597

Metadata

Authors
Schlegl, T., Waldstein, S. M., Bogunovic, H., Endstraßer, F., Sadeghipour, A., Philip, A.-M., Podkowinski, D., Gerendas, B. S., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U.
Venue
Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
549-558
ISSN
0161-6420 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772059204
Cited by
597
References
6
FWCI
30.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fully Automated Detection and Quantification of Macular Fluid in OCT Using Deep Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.031
The paper
Schlegl, T., Waldstein, S. M., Bogunovic, H., Endstraßer, F., Sadeghipour, A., Philip, A.-M., Podkowinski, D., Gerendas, B. S., Langs, G., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2018). Fully Automated Detection and Quantification of Macular Fluid in OCT Using Deep Learning. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.