Cited by 54Body Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Comparison of anthropometric and body composition measures as predictors of components of the metabolic syndrome in a clinical setting.

Mooney, Stephen J., Baecker, Aileen, Rundle, Andrew G.·2013·Obesity Research & Clinical Practice

Abstract

Problem The use of body mass index (BMI) to assess obesity and health risks has been criticized in scientific and lay publications because of its failure to account for body shape and inability to distinguish fat mass from lean mass. We sought to determine whether other anthropometric measures (waist circumference (WC), waist-to-height ratio (WtH), percent body fat (%BF), fat mass index (FMI), or fat-free mass index (FFMI)) were consistently better predictors of components of the metabolic syndrome than BMI is.Methods Cross-sectional measurements of height, weight, waist circumference and percent body fat were obtained from 12,294 adults who took part in annual physical exams provided by EHE International, Inc. Blood pressure was measured during the exam and HDL, LDL, and fasting glucose were measured from blood samples. Pearson correlations, linear regression, and adjusted Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to relate each anthropometric measure to each metabolic risk factor.Results None of the measures was consistently the strongest predictor. BMI was the strongest predictor of blood pressure, measures related to central adiposity (WC and WtH) performed better at predicting fasting glucose, and all measures were roughly comparable at predicting cholesterol levels. In all, differences in areas under ROC curves were 0.03 or less for all measure/outcome pairs that performed better than BMI.Conclusion Body mass index is an adequate measure of adiposity for clinical purposes. In the context of lay press critiques of BMI and recommendations for alternative body-size measures, these data support clinicians making recommendations to patients based on BMI measurements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.orcp.2012.10.004

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mooney, S. J., Baecker, A., & Rundle, A. G.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Rundle, Andrew G.
Venue
Obesity Research & Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e55-e66
ISSN
1871-403X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091510303
Cited by
54
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Research & Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body mass index, anthropometric measures, body composition, metabolic syndrome, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, body fat percentage, fat mass index, fat-free mass index, abdominal obesity, fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, cholesterol, obesity assessment
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Anthropometry, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Body Composition, Cholesterol, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, Waist Circumference, Young Adult, Obesity, Abdominal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review